Connect with us

News

Milquetoast Conservative Calls on Right Wing to “Disown” Michelle Malkin

Published

on

On July 19, 2020, conservatives rallied at the Denver state capitol where they were by a mob of agitators who assaulted them.

As they were attacked, the police stood by idly.

One of the most prominent people who was attacked at this rally was conservative commentator Michelle Malkin.

Trending: North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes

One “conservative” commentator Andrew Struttman, an owner and partner of Saratoga Strategies, penned an article in the Denver Post on this situation.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Although he condemned the leftist mob’s attack, he went out of his way to attack Malkin as well.

He believed that this rally was a “painful reminder that Malkin remains a part of the conservative movement in Colorado.”

Struttman added that “It is morally unconscionable that she has a platform within conservative circles, including speaking at this rally.”

The conservative operative did acknowledge Malkin’s support for immigration restriction but then called her out for moving “on to the fever swamps of the Alt Right.”

He was particularly furious about Malkin’s relationship with Nick Fuentes, a podcaster who has raised provocative questions about immigration and the U.S.’s relationship with Israel.

The “Groyper Army” — an informal band of nationalists who have turned up the heat on Conservatism Inc. at public events — particularly annoyed Struttman.

He noted that the Groypers “regularly sabotage the events of mainstream conservatives like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Rep. Dan Crenshaw, and Donald Trump Jr., trolling the Q&A with questions about white identity and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.”

In reality, the questions these individuals asked concerned the demographic and economic displacement effects of mass migration and why the U.S. must unconditionally support Israel.

He was particularly irked that Malkin used her final speech at Young America’s Foundation to defend the Groypers and Nick Fuentes, along with immigration patriots such as Peter Brimelow and John Derbyshire.

Malkin would later headline a Groyper event where she lambasted Conservatism Inc. and called Colorado Senator Cory Gardener a “hispanderer” for his limp-wristed attempts to court Hispanic voters.

During her talk at the Groyper summit, she said that she was “very confident that you, the Light Brigade, the America First Brigade, are well positioned to do what so few other grassroots revolts and rebellions have succeeded in doing. I believe in you. I honor your charge. I honor your mission.”

For Struttman, this was a “full-throated embrace of white dominance over minorities” despite providing no evidence of Groypers calling for racial subjugation. Most of their message has been centered around immigration skepticism, traditionalism, and foreign policy non-interventionism.

Unfortunately, in today’s ever-narrowing social discourse, no one cares for nuances. Most of the Dissident Right, must come to the realization that some of their biggest enemies come from the “official” Right.

Proper social distancing from these approval seekers must be applied. The development of a parallel political infrastructure is crucial for the Dissident Right’s existence moving forward.

Campaign 2020

Thanks to Spineless, Establishment Republicans, Senate Panel Delays Vote to Subpoena Big Tech CEOs

Republicans Continue to Show Pathetic They are on the Issues that Matter Most

Published

on

America First nationalist’s hopes of having Big Tech CEOs testify before Congress about allegations of censorship directed towards the Right were temporarily dashed on October 19, 2020.

Politico reported that the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed plans to vote on subpoenas to force the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook to go before the Senate and be questioned about their anti-Right wing censorship policies.

Some Republicans ended up having cold feet and decided to postpone the vote much to the disappointment of right wing activists who have complained about Big Tech’s anti-free speech policies.

President Donald Trump and a number of nationalist Republicans have sharply criticized Facebook and Twitter over their censorship of a controversial New York Post report that exposed Hunter Biden, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, and his corrupt behavior.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Originally, GOP officials in the Judiciary Committee announced plans to hold a markup on October 20 to determine if they would subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to get his perspective on allegations concerning his company’s policies that muzzle conservative viewpoints. Twitter denies claims regarding Twitter’s censorship policies.

South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who is the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, revealed that the planned vote would also call on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify.

The panel stated on October 19 that it would determine whether they would issue subpoenas during a executive session on October 22 where it will also allegedly approve Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. The committee declared in a statement that it will maintain negotiations with the companies “to allow for voluntary testimony” by the CEO. However, if an agreement cannot be reached, the panel will proceed to take a vote on the subpoenas “at a date to be determined.”

The subpoenas would compel the tech big wigs to testify on the reports of “suppression and/or censorship” of New York Post stories and on “any other content moderation policies, practices, or actions that may interfere with or influence elections for federal office,” according to a committee document released on October 19.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who is the chair of the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution said to reporters that he’s expecting the committee to preside over testimonies from the Twitter and Facebook chiefs “shortly” regardless of whether they come to the decision on their own volition.

“One way or another, either voluntarily or pursuant to subpoena, they will testify and they will testify before the election,” Cruz stated.

In a separate hearing for the Senate Commerce Committee, Zuckerberg and Dorsey will join Google CEO Sundar Pichai on October 28 for a hearing on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields Big Tech companies from a liability.

Cruz, who is a member of both Judiciary and Commerce committees, wants each panel to carry out their own hearings with the tech chiefs before election day. “I believe we need a separate hearing in Judiciary because the issues being discussed in the two committees are different,” Cruz remarked.

Big Tech has become too powerful, especially during a time when social media has become the de facto public square. Republicans will need to get serious about making online speech receive the same treatment as general political speech.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending