Connect with us

Opinion

MOSELEY: It’s Time To Send The CO2-Obsessed Back To Science Class

Published

on

Advocates of a hypothesis that there is global warming that humans are causing ridicule those who won’t join their club.  Yet the problem is that our schools have spread lack of understanding throughout our once-great society.  Every institution run by people has been diminished.  So let this be a primer if readers want to understand the hypothesis of global warming or try to free a believer from their fever:

I.    Failing Freshman Statistics

The vast majority of the Earth is not being measured by weather stations.  As we try to compare temperatures earlier in time, the poor coverage grows radically worse the farther back in time we go toward 1880.

Trending: Tennessee’s Marsha Blackburn Calls on Ilhan Omar to Resign After Minnesota Democrat Calls to “Dismantle” U.S. “System of Oppression”

The Earth’s surface measures 196.9 million square miles.  Today, there are an estimated 10,100 weather stations world-wide, in addition to 1,000 free-floating buoys completely useless for measuring climate change.

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

That means that if the temperature measurements were spread evenly across the Earth’s surface (they aren’t), there would be 1 weather station for every 19,495 square miles of the Earth’s surface.  That’s almost the size of the State of Maryland (12,407 square miles).

Can today’s pseudo-scientists measure trends in the planet’s temperature?  No.    Here’s why:

First, the vast majority of the Earth’s surface is not being measured.

Second, a statistically valid sample, must be a random sample.  You must take 196.9 million temperature measurements and average 196.9 million temperature measurements to come up with a single global average.

We can only resort to a smaller sample if the sample is random.  But it is not.  Any first-year student in undergraduate science would get an “F” if he tried to use a non-random sample to extrapolate the Earth’s overall global temperature.

But it gets worse.  Third, the temperature as a serious instrument of scientific measurement – as opposed to a toy or novelty — dates only to 1880.  That’s 139 years of temperature records.  A standardized, calibrated instrument of consistent manufacture using temperature scales started providing useful records only from 1880.

But in 1880, careful, historical, temperature records only started in a few large cities in Western Europe and the Northeast United States.  I don’t mean that someone was using a thermometer.  I mean carefully keeping precise, historical records to be maintained for posterity.

Fourth, how can we compare temperature records from 1970 to 1910 when the locations being measured were not the same in 1910 as in 1970?  The number and locations being measured were concentrated in Western Europe and Northeastern North America.

This is why free-floating buoys are useless (for this purpose).  We cannot compare the temperature records from one year to the next, because they are not measuring the same place year to year.  The 1,000 buoys, 7,000 ships, and various airplanes may be good for monitoring “weather” — the movement of air masses and changes in pressure driving weather systems — but useless for measuring the planet’s temperature over the long haul.  (And that is not “random.”  Letting buoys drift does not constitute a truly random sample, starting from scratch for each measurement.)

Measurements from satellites systematically disagree with measurements at the Earth’s surface.  Pseudo-scientists “adjust” (a.k.a. falsify) satellite data to hide this problem.

Fifth, temperature measurements of planet Earth would get an “F” grade in Freshman statistics.  And that’s before we get into missing measurements when stations malfunction, temperature stations at airports in the exhaust of jet engines of airplanes taking off, next to fire department barbecues, next to industrial air conditioning exhaust, near asphalt or brick heat sinks, or in heat islands.  And then there are the 80%+ weather stations that don’t meet the required standards, especially for site locations.  And then there is the outright fraud in the temperature measurements that have been exposed.

Sixth, since most weather stations are at airports, we are measuring the transition in aviation from small propeller planes, to large propeller planes, to small jet engine airplanes, to massive jumbo jets.  There are weather stations actually in the line of jet exhaust at the end of runways being blasted with super-heated jet exhaust.  But notice that airplanes have changed over the decades.  So the temperature of the heat from aviation operations is much hotter now with jumbo jets than in 1930 with small propeller planes.  And the quantity of take-offs and landings is dramatically larger.  The Earth is not getting warmer.  The airplanes blowing exhaust into the airport weather stations are getting bigger and more frequent per day.

So has the Earth warmed since 1880?  We haven’t the slightest clue.  And before 1880, “proxy” measurements are completely unscientific.  No, you can’t use tree rings or sediment layers, because you can’t measure things with a margin of error vastly wider than the small changes you are trying to discern.  Consistent levels of precision with your instruments of measure is a fundamental precept of science.  Where tree rings are imprecise, you cannot use them to calculate precise analysis.  No one knows if the Earth has warmed or cooled, and anyone who tries to say they do either doesn’t know science or hopes you don’t know science.

II.   The Fatal Flaw:  Air Travels

The real issue is that air does not stay still.  One of the defining characteristics of the atmosphere is that it is constantly in motion.  Air masses (weather) travel around.  So a weather station in Los Angeles may show an unusually high temperature because the colder air up and moved somewhere else.  But there is no net change for the planet as a whole.

III.   The Ever-Churning Atmosphere Cools the Earth

When heated, “hot air rises.”  Technically, the gases in a particular air mass expand  when heated.  When gases expand, that air mass becomes less dense than the air on either side or above it.  The pocket of warm air rises — driven by denser, heavier air forcing its way down underneath.

This is what cools the Earth.  This is the process that drives thunderstorms and hurricanes.

Convection operates as an air conditioner for the planet.  Air heated near the surface rises.  Warmth at the Earth’s surface is carried upward, where it is released.  Heat is transported up towards space.  This conveyor belt will cycle faster if free-floating CO2 absorbs more heat.

But the higher we go in altitude, the thinner the air is.  At 30,000 feet, the air is only 30% of the air pressure at the Earth’s surface.  So when gas molecules radiate heat in the form of electromagnetic energy, the probability that the energy will exit the atmosphere, leave planet Earth entirely,  and radiate out into space increases with altitude.

The chance the heat will travel down is the same as the chance it will travel out into space.  But the atmosphere is thinner above than below, so a significant fraction of the heat energy will leave the planet instead of hitting other air molecules.

IV.     There is no Greenhouse Effect in the Open Atmosphere

The “greenhouse” metaphor is a fatally flawed idea.  A greenhouse works by trapping air in an enclosed container.  The air inside is warmed by sunshine.  But the trapped air cannot move  So the air heated by sunlight grows hotter inside than outside.

Now, imagine hooligans steal the glass panels out of a greenhouse.  They carry glass panels around randomly.  Will there be a greenhouse effect?  No. The air inside is no longer trapped.  There is no “green house effect” in the open atmosphere, where gases are free to circulate.

V.    Carbon Dioxide is Not a Blanket

A blanket works by trapping warmth generated by your body.  If you put a blanket out in the forest in the Winter snow, the blanket will be just as cold as the snow.  If a blanket floated up from your bed and floated around the room it would never trap warmth.

So carbon dioxide does not have a ‘blanket’ effect.  It does not stay at the Earth’s surface.  Cooler air drops down from above as the hotter air at the surface changes places.  This circulation is called convection by junior high school science teachers.

VI.   That’s Why Global Warming Is Not Scientific

Therefore, we cannot perform any experimentation of how carbon dioxide may play a role in global temperature.  We can observe CO2 trapped in a container in a laboratory.  But that tells us nothing about what happens when CO2 is floating freely in a complex planet-wide atmospheric system.

There has never been a single experiment testing the hypothesis of human-caused climate change.  But such an experiment would be an impossibility.  Remember that all other variables would have to be controlled and kept constant, when they are not constant.

Scientists would literally need to compare Earth A to Earth B to see the planet-wide effects of increasing carbon dioxide in only Earth A but not Earth B.  Is there a greenhouse effect on Venus?  We would actually have to run a comparison between Venus A and Venus B to do real science.  (What advocates are trying to do is compare an earlier time period with a current time period on the same Earth.  This fails, however, because all other variables are not the same.  the Earth’s orbit changes over time, causing the ice ages and inter-glacial warm periods.  So a 1,000 year period on Earth in the past is different from a recent 1,000 year period even on the same Earth.)

Around The World

Not all Shi’a-Majority Nations are the Same

Published

on

The recent alleged arson attack on the Tomb of Esther and Mordechai, a Jewish holy site in Iran, was indicative of the ever-rising rate of anti-Semitism and broader religious intolerance in the Islamic Republic. The recently released United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) annual report had highlighted Iran’s anti-Semitic targeting of its small Jewish population as well as other minorities including followers of the Baha’i faith; the most persecuted faith in Iran.

The USCIRF described that it documented “a particular uptick in the persecution of Baha’is and local government officials who supported them in 2019. Iran’s government blamed Baha’is —without evidence — for widespread popular protests, accusing the community of collaboration with Israel, where the Baha’i World Centre is located. Iran’s government also continued to promote hatred against Baha’is and other religious minorities on traditional and social media channels.”

U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Elan Carr has said that “anti-Semitism isn’t ancillary to the ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is a central foundational component of the ideology of that regime, and we have to be clear about it, and we have to confront it and call it out for what it is.” After the Tomb of Esther and Mordechai was set ablaze last weekend, Carr reiterated these statements and called Iran the “world’s chief state sponsor of anti-Semitism.”

In 2016 I wrote, “According to Articles 12 and 13 of the Iranian Constitution, all branches of Islam and Christianity have the right to worship, as do Jews and Zoroastrians, within the limits of the law there. However, converting away from Islam to any other religion is considered haram, or forbidden, and in many cases, could result in execution.”

Anti-Semitism is a historical reality in Iran’s strict brand of Shi’a Islam, which emphasizes the separation between believers and non-believers, expressed in terms of purity versus impurity. The Jewish People Policy Planning Institute explains that in Iran, “under the influence of Zoroastrian traditions, the Jews were considered physically impure and untouchable (najasa). Jews were also prohibited from inheriting from Shiites, whereas the opposite was allowed. A Jew who converted to Islam was entitled to the entire inheritance. Shiites were not allowed to marry Jewish women, except for in temporary marriage (mut’a), which is an inferior and exploitative type of concubinage.”

It is also a little-known fact that the country name of Iran is derived from the ancient Persian word Arya, a linguistic predecessor of the modern European term Aryan. Further, Armenian Nazi collaborator Garegin Nzhdeh (1886-1955) is the founder of the racist Tseghakronism movement, whose ideology is reminiscent of the Aryan supremacy espoused by Nzhdeh’s Nazi comrades. Today, Nzhdeh’s brand of Aryan and anti-Semitic ideology is palpable in both Armenia and Iran, neighboring countries where the Anti-Defamation League has documented that more than half of the populations hold a series of anti-Semitic views — at even higher rate in Armenia (58 percent) than in Iran (56 percent).

At the same time, it is important to note that the majority of Iranians are secular and the regime does not necessarily represent them, or their values. In fact, the Iranian government persecutes its Azerbaijani, Arab, and other citizens from minority populations.

Yet a stark contrast with Iran is found in its Shi’a-majority neighbor, Azerbaijan, which has strong relations with Israel and protects its Jewish citizens as well as other religious and ethnic minorities.

Southern California-based evangelical pastor Johnnie Moore has elaborated on the telling differences in the realm of religious tolerance between Azerbaijan and Iran, noting that Azerbaijan is “a country where Sunni and Shi’a clerics pray together, where Evangelical and Russian Orthodox Christians serve together, and where thriving Jewish communities enjoy freedom and total security in their almost entirely Islamic country.” He has also called Azerbaijan “a model for peaceful coexistence between religions.”

During my own visit to Azerbaijan, I observed and documented this first-hand. I believe that Azerbaijan is a nation that bears the torch, and burden, of bringing religious freedom to its less tolerant neighbors in the region, like Iran.

Perhaps the most dramatic indicator of Azerbaijani tolerance is the post-Soviet state’s special relationship with its Jewish community and with Israel. Last November, Azerbaijan unveiled a statue in honor of the nation’s Jewish war hero Albert Agarunov (1969-1992). Although Agarunov was killed in battle, his legacy remains a powerful symbol of Jewish integration and pride for his Muslim-majority country.

Israel and Azerbaijan have closely cooperated for more than a decade in the realms of security, energy, and tourism. Most recently, Azerbaijan sent its Finance Minister Samir Sharifov to this year’s American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) policy conference, where Sharifov said that the country’s “cooperation with Israel is not limited to oil supply; we are interested in widening cooperation in defense and the transfer of technology.”

Sharifov also read remarks from a letter to AIPAC by Mehriban Aliyeva, the first vice president of Azerbaijan, who wrote, “It is gratifying that our former compatriots of Jewish origin, living nowadays in the United States and Israel, have maintained close ties with Azerbaijan and contribute to the strengthening of our relations with these countries. We are grateful to them.”

How can Azerbaijan govern and act so differently from its Shi’a neighbor? Iran is a theocracy that mixes religion and state more thoroughly than any other country in the world. In contrast, Azerbaijan’s constitution affirms the country as a secular state and ensures religious freedom for its citizens. Azerbaijan is also facing its own human rights issues and working on progressing as a nation. However, the fact of the matter remains, though Iran and Azerbaijan share a border, the similarities between their governments largely end there. Not all Shi’a-majority nations are the same.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending