Reliable Never Trump acolyte Ana Navarro defends Big Tech censorship.
After being pressured by followers for her selective praise of Hispanic entertainers like Gloria and Emilio Estefan, she started her inevitable descent towards Never Trumping.
Eventually, the conversation devolved into a discussion about Tech censorship, of which Navarro sided with Silicon Valley censors.
— Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@ananavarro) May 4, 2019
Navarro said “I applaud Facebook for banning ppl who violate policies by peddling, hate, conspiracy theories & lies which trigger crazies & put ppl at risk.”
The CNN commentator has a proven history of political elitisim, most evident in a debate between her and Steve Cortes , in which she filed her nails while Steve Cortes was talking about immigration.
Navarro’s comments are the latest of Never Trump praise for Big Tech censorship.
BLP covered Erick Erickson’s dismissal of conservative commentators such as Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, and Laura Loomer as “reactionaries.”
Other legacy conservatives like Cabot Phillips counter-signaled his support for free-markets in this case, despite the fact that Big Tech companies enjoy many state privileges that allow them to act as publishers but also have the benefits of platforms.
This latest outcry may be the tipping point for the Trump administration to take a stand against Silicon Valley’s social media thought policing.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
British Politicians Believe that the Wuhan Virus Pandemic Might Have Come from a Leak at a Chinese Laboratory
Although senior insiders in the British government maintained that “the balance of scientific advice” is still sticking to the original theory that the virus was first spread to humans from a wet market in Wuhan, a leak coming out of a laboratory in Wuhan is “no longer being discounted.”
. A member of Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s emergency committee recently said that while the latest intelligence report did not argue that the virus was “zoonotic” – coming from animals – it did not toss out the theory that the virus came from a leak at a Wuhan laboratory.
The member of the “Cobra” committee, which receives classified information from the security services, commented: “There is a credible alternative view [to the zoonotic theory] based on the nature of the virus. Perhaps it is no coincidence that there is that laboratory in Wuhan. It is not discounted.”
Wuhan is where the Chinese Institute of Virology is based in.
This institute is generally viewed as one of the most secure virology units in the globe.
The government-backed People’s Daily newspaper stated back in 2018 that this institute was “capable of conducting experiments with highly pathogenic microorganisms” like the deadly Ebola virus.
Scientists at the institute were the first to indicate that the virus’s genome was 96 per cent similar to one usually found in bats.
Despite being known for its tight security, there have been unverified local reports of workers at the institute becoming infected after being sprayed by blood. Subsequently, they would carry out the infection and spread it to the local population.
A second institute in the city, the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control is also speculated to have conducted experiments on animals such as bats to understand how the Wuhan Virus is spread.
Professor Richard Ebright, of Rutgers University’s Waksman Institute of Microbiology, New Jersey, said that while there is evidence that the Wuhan Virus was not created in one of the Wuhan laboratories, such a concept is not outside the realm of possibility.
Professor Ebright claims to have seen evidence that scientists at the Centre for Disease Control and the Institute of Virology studied the viruses with only “level 2” security – instead of the suggested level 4 security level – which “’provides only minimal protections against infection of lab workers.”
He continued: “Virus collection, culture, isolation, or animal infection would pose a substantial risk of infection of a lab worker, and from the lab worker then the public.”
He concluded that the evidence established “a basis to rule out [that coronavirus is] a lab construct, but no basis to rule out a lab accident.”
According to a study from the South China University of Technology, the Wuhan Virus “probably” originated from the Centre for Disease Control. Curiously, shortly after this finding was published, the research paper was deleted from a social networking site for scientists and researchers.
A few days ago, Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government said it “did not recognize” claims the virus emerged from a Chinese laboratory.
Regardless of whether China purposely released the virus or not, the authoritarian country still poses a threat to American interests.
American policymakers will need to re-consider trade and immigration policies with the country.
Deep State1 day ago
ACCOUNTABILITY: President Trump Fires Deep State Snitch Who Triggered Impeachment Hysteria
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Feds Seize and Redistribute Medical Supplies From Preppers in Unprecedented Power Grab
Big League Economics3 days ago
BLOODBATH: Coronavirus Panic Expected to Wipe Out 110,000+ Restaurants, Devastate U.S. Food Service Industry
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Arizona’s McSally Calls for ‘Communist’ Director of World Health Organization to Step Down
Tech2 days ago
Banished Journalist Laura Loomer’s $1.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tech Giants Will Be Heard in Court
States4 days ago
Civil Rights Lawsuit Filed Against Anti-Trump Michigan Governor Over Coronavirus Shutdown Orders
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Expert Warns That Fears of Chinese Coronavirus Being a Bioweapon Should Not Be Dismissed
Fake News Media3 days ago
WATCH: Trump ROASTS Acosta: “Go Ahead Jim, Try Another One”