Connect with us

Culture

New York Times Editor Admits to Targeting Trump Brands to Get Him to Resign

Published

on

Project Veritas has released their latest undercover video in the American Pravda series, and this time the undercover video is taking us inside The New York Times — where an editor admits to targeting the Trump brands and family to attempt to strong arm President Donald J. Trump into resigning.

The subject of the latest video is Nick Dudich, the Audience Strategy Editor for NYT Video. In the shocking footage, he is caught on hidden camera bragging about his lack of journalistic integrity.

Trending: Twitter Suspends US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner For Celebrating the Effectiveness of Trump’s Border Wall

While discussing whether or not he is objective, Dudich tells the undercover Veritas journalist, “No I’m not, that’s why I’m here.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

He adds: “My voice is on… my imprint is in every video we do.”

Dudich, who worked for the political campaigns of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, goes on to explain: “I’d target his businesses, his dumb f#ck of a son, Donald Jr., and Eric.”

There is more.

“Target that. Get people to boycott going to his hotels. Boycott… So a lot of the Trump brands, if you can ruin the Trump brand and you put pressure on his business and you start investigating his business and you start shutting it down, or they’re hacking or other things. He cares about his business more than he cares about being President. He would resign. Or he’d lash out and do something incredibly illegal, which he would have to,” he said.

The NYT video editor also brags about his former involvement with Antifa, claiming that he was asked to join by his godfather —  former FBI Director James Comey himself.

“I joined that stuff for them [the FBI]. I was an asset… So it was intelligence gathering, seeing if they were [sic], what their agenda was, whether they’re a threat or not,” Dudich claims.

“How’d you meet Comey?” asked the Project Veritas journalist.

“He’s my godfather,” Dudich stated. “My dad and mom knew him and his wife for a really long time.”

Dudich also admits that he should have recused himself from covering the Comey hearing, but did not.

“Well the Comey hearing, I should have recused myself, but I’m not ever telling anybody there [at the Times] that I have a tie with that or else I don’t know if they can keep me on,” Dudich told the undercover journalist.

In their press release accompanying the video, Project Veritas said according to the NYT Ethical Handbook, Section 107:

Staff members may not write about people to whom they are related by blood or marriage or with whom they have close personal relationships, or edit material about such people or make news judgments about them.

After being confronted about his father saying that they do not have ties to Comey, Dudich admits that he lied.

When asked why he made up the connection, he said: “Eh, I don’t know… It’s a good story.”

The New York Times has long claimed to be objective and the gatekeepers of truth and impartiality. According to their own ethics handbook, “journalists have no place on the playing field of politics. Staff members are entitled to vote, but they must do nothing that might raise questions about their professional neutrality or that of The Times.”

The New York Times video is a continuation of the American Pravda series from Project Veritas, which previously took aim at CNN.

Campaign 2020

University of Pennsylvania Workers Overwhelmingly Support the Democrat Party

From Top to Bottom Universities are in the Tank for Democrats

Published

on

Employees at the University of Pennsylvania are overwhelmingly in the tank for the Democrat Party.

Ophelia Jacobson of Campus Reform reported that University of Pennsylvania employees contributed to Democrat candidates, campaigns, and organizations between 2019 and 2020. Campus Reform was able to gather the data by turning to the Federal Election Commission.

Per the Campus Reform analysis, a whopping 97.6 percent of campaign contributions in 2019 and 2020 made by Penn instructors, staff, and administrators were sent to “Democratic organizations, candidates, and their campaigns.” Some of these groups and causes included ActBlue, Win the Era PAC, Biden for President, and MoveOn Political Action.

The remaining 2.4 percent of contributions went to Republican causes. These included WinRed, Donald J. Trump for President, and the Republican National Committee.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To get more specific, of the 715 donations that Penn faculty members made, just 11 were sent to Republican candidates, institutions or campaigns. This number represented 1.5 percent of campaign contributions pitched in by faculty members. The remaining 98.4 percent of donations were sent to Democrat causes.

Staff contributions showed similar trends. 97.6 percent of contributions were sent to Democrat campaigns, candidates, or organizations, whereas 2.4 percent were sent to Republicans.

Penn administrators donated 731 times during the time-frame of 2019 and 2020. Curiously, 21 of those 731 contributions (2.8 percent) were only made to Republican causes and the remainder (97.1 percent) were sent to Democrat causes.

This analysis reported that ActBlue was the principal organization that Penn workers donated to as far as Democrats institutions were concerned. In contrast, WinRed was the largest recipient of donations of all the Republican organizations.

Just another case of an American institution of higher learning being filled with leftist staff across the board. Let’s face it, universities are a magnet for the Left and work to perpetuate such a political paradigm.

Conservatives should take note. These institutions and the drones who work for them are the enemy. In light of this, the Right should aim to defund public universities and make sure to attend alternative educational institutions if possible. These institutions do not deserve a single penny from right wingers.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending