Connect with us

Around The World

Opinion: U.S. Must Be Able to See Wood for the Trees in Critical Negotiations with Taliban Over Afghanistan’s Future

Published

on

With presidential elections in Afghanistan scheduled for September 28th, the United States and Afghanistan have reached a critical point in their bilateral relationship while the U.S. is trying to strike an agreement with the Taliban for peace, for the sake of the Afghan people and the country’s future.

As talks with the U.S. continue, the Taliban are not pulling their punches on the battlefield and the Afghan government is counter-attacking.

It is clear that the Taliban wants to maximize its leverage during the talks through terrorism and the Afghan government is fighting back.

Most recently, more than 30 people were killed and over 100 injured in a series of Taliban attacks in Kabul and Ghazni. It is the Afghan people who suffer most from the Taliban’s violence during this sensitive and critical situation.

Trending: Leftist Thug Targets Roger Stone’s Handicapped Wife for Vicious Attack in Own Neighborhood

These recent events have demonstrated that the Taliban can sow chaos, can inflict damage, and continue to instill fear into the Afghan population, but it cannot win this war militarily. Therefore, peace with the Afghan government – for however long it may last — is the Taliban’s sole resolution.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

However, several months ago, a personal falling out between the U.S. and Afghanistan has still not been corrected and it should be fixed as soon as possible for the benefit of both nations.

Specifically, U.S. officials have made the decision to keep at arm’s length Afghanistan’s national security adviser, Hamdullah Mohib, a trusted senior aide of Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani, over a less-than diplomatic comment that was made about the American special envoy to talks with the Taliban.

Understandably, the perception of being left in the dark over negotiations about the future of its nation and people because the Taliban did not want the Ghani government at the negotiating table is an irksome matter.  More importantly to America, the decision to keep Mr. Mohib at a distance has not served the U.S. interest.

Mr. Mohib is a trusted security advisor to President Ghani, whom he relies on and it is important, albeit critical, that the former Afghan ambassador to the United States, continues playing a central role in the bilateral security talks between the U.S. and Afghanistan.  As Afghanistan’s top diplomat in the U.S. previously, Mr. Mohib established very good working relations with the U.S. government and the Washington establishment.  Those relations and his continued work as the national security advisor remain as important as ever in preserving close security cooperation between the two nations during this fluid period in Afghanistan.

Indeed, Ambassador Mohib is America’s best-suited interlocutor on the Afghan side.

It is important for the U.S. to get past the misunderstanding for America’s sake and Afghanistan’s.  Afghanistan is too important an ally not to and al-Qaeda is a testament to that. An open, working backchannel between the U.S. and Afghanistan during our Government’s talks with the Taliban in Doha is paramount in ensuring the Taliban do not gain the strength it possessed before the tragedy of 9/11. Neither the U.S. nor Afghanistan can afford that again.

Certainly, strong security cooperation between the two countries at the level of national security advisor is needed now more than ever for both nations.

It has been reported that the U.S. has agreed with the Taliban that American forces will  leave Afghanistan by November 2020, although a Taliban  spokesman, Suhail Shaheen, has claimed that during the Taliban’s talks with the U.S. America “has agreed to withdraw all forces from Afghanistan and to not intervene in future Afghan affairs.”

Whatever the case, based on press reports and historical context, we can expect that the U.S. will continue to maintain a counter-terrorism presence in Afghanistan after that date, notwithstanding Taliban statements.  It will be doubly important for the United States to have close security cooperation with the Afghan government after the U.S. withdrawal.

The Trump administration is shepherding a very sensitive process in its negotiations with the Taliban, an organization that harbored al-Qaeda. The Ghani administration and the people of Afghanistan must be reassured that the U.S. will do right by them and not create a security vacuum by withdrawing in a way that will leave both nations worse off.   “Conditions-based withdrawal” benchmarks must be met by the Taliban. This requires a solid line of communication by the U.S. with the Ghani administration so that the latter knows what will be expected of the Taliban after an American withdrawal and the Afghan government can best manage new realities on the ground.  That American channel of communication to our friends in Kabul should run through the Afghan national security advisor.

Ultimately, it will be up to the Afghans themselves, their government – including the Taliban for now – to decide upon the future of their country.  History has taught us that their future will also be ours.

The United States should have the foresight to see the wood for the trees.

Around The World

Norway Turns Against Dangerous COVID-19 Vaccines, Warns ‘Very Frail’ People Should Not Take the Shots

These vaccines can be deadly.

Published

on

Health officials in Norway are now warning “very frail” people that they should not take the COVID-19 inoculation because of dangerous side-effects from the experimental shots.

Coronavirus hysteria skeptic Alex Berenson posted a translated version of an article from a Norwegian news outlet.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So far, the Norwegian Medicines Agency has assessed 20 adverse reaction reports after the COVID-19 vaccination. 13 of these had a fatal outcome, shows a new report from the Norwegian Medicines Agency,” the translated report states.

“If you are very frail, you should probably not be vaccinated, said subject director Steinar Maden in the Norwegian Medicines Agency at a webinar on coronary vaccine for journalists on Thursday,” it continues.

Negative side-effects from the vaccine included fever, malaise, and reactions at the injection site as well as gastrointestinal symptoms like nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. The most common side-effects are respiratory symptoms including cough and shortness of breath.

This is the first report on side effects from the Norwegian Medicines Agency, which will in future come with weekly side effect reports,” the report stated.

Big League Politics has been reporting on the terrible side-effects of experimental COVID-19 vaccines for many months now:

A group of doctors is urging the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to make the public aware of the painful side effects that will come with the experimental COVID-19 vaccines that have been rushed through the testing process.

Dr. Sandra Fryhofer of the American Medical Association (AMA) is worried that lying to the public will cause them not to pursue the full COVID-19 vaccine treatment, which is expected to take at least two doses.

“We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park,” Fryhofer said during a virtual meeting with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of outside medical experts tasked with advising the CDC. “They are going to know they had a vaccine. They are probably not going to feel wonderful. But they’ve got to come back for that second dose.”

Dr. Nancy Messonnier, who works as director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, says their agency is working on providing a guidance of sorts for health care officials about the side-effects of the COVID-19 vaccines.

“How does that impact planning on a hospital level in terms of which staff gets vaccinated which day?” Messonnier said.

However, the CDC does not seem too concerned about educating the public about the dangers of these experimental vaccines…

The vaccine regime that is coming into place is a technocrat’s dream, with COVID-19 mass hysteria used to fuel this crazed push to inject the world with experimental shots.

As more people are stuck with this Big Pharma poison, the so-called conspiracy theorists are proven right with their concerns.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending