President Donald Trump is aware of James O’Keefe’s ground-breaking exposé of Google’s electoral interference operation heading into 2020, and says he is considering a lawsuit against the tech giant for striking against U.S. democracy under the cover of darkness.
“We should be suing Google and Facebook and all that, which perhaps we will,” Trump said while giving an interview over the phone to the Fox Business Network.
Google continues to deny the obvious, believing that they are above the law, and attempting to continue onward with their electoral manipulation schemes unabated.
“We build our products with extraordinary care and safeguards to be a trustworthy source of information for everyone, without any regard for political viewpoint. Our rating guidelines are publicly visible for all to see,” a Google spokesperson wrote in an email in response to Trump.
Trump also criticized Twitter for “making it very hard” to “get out my message” heading into 2020.
“Twitter is just terrible, what they do,” he added.
“These people are all Democrats. It’s totally biased towards Democrats,” Trump said of the Big Tech monopolists.
Trump has had his eye on these developments as censorship has worsened for his supporters on the monopoly platforms:
I am continuing to monitor the censorship of AMERICAN CITIZENS on social media platforms. This is the United States of America — and we have what’s known as FREEDOM OF SPEECH! We are monitoring and watching, closely!!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 3, 2019
Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) is looking at Google and other Big Tech firms as the potential target for anti-trust suits for their abusive business practices.
“The current landscape suggests there are only one or two significant players in important digital spaces, including internet search, social networks, mobile and desktop operating systems, and electronic book sales,” said Justice Department’s antitrust chief Makan Delrahim.
“By protecting competition, we can have an impact on privacy and data protection,” he said.
Jen Gennai, who works as Head of Responsible Innovation for Google, was caught on video by Project Veritas talking about how breaking up Google, as proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), was a bad idea because their monolithic corporation would work to ensure a situation like President Trump never happened again.
“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again,” Gennai said.
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?” she added.
An antitrust suit against Google may be one way to cut them down to size. Another solution may be legislation from freshman U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) to remove Big Tech’s special immunity privileges under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act unless they prove their algorithms are unbiased.
Dave Rubin Berated on Social Media for Claiming ‘Free Markets’ Will Stop Big Tech Tyranny
Nobody is buying what Rubin’s selling anymore.
Left-libertarian pundit Dave Rubin is getting hammered on social media by conservatives offended by his notion that the “free market” will somehow end Big Tech tyranny without government intervention.
Rubin disagreed with President Trump’s call for action to reign in Big Tech as they commit Orwellian censorship and attempt to meddle in electoral politics.
Conservatives must fight the impulse to regulate big tech. Competition, free markets and human ingenuity are the answer. Not taking one big problem and combining it with another big problem.
— Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) May 27, 2020
Rubin’s tweet caused many people to point out how his ideology is a failure and does nothing to actually preserve freedom of speech in any tangible sense.
“Man Dave…seems like years of gatekeeping and sucking up to Susan at YouTube has made the entire internet hate your guts,” wrote Twitter user @terrorsperg.
“How long until big tech controls every aspect of our life? We going to just let them destroy us in the name of “free markets?” There is a serious discussion to be had here about whether they are publisher or platform,” twitter user @MadManCris49 wrote.
“Conservatives are going to be “noble losers” until the end of time unless they actually start fighting fire with fire,” wrote Twitter user @tdschwinn.
“There is no Free Market is Social Media anymore. It’s a dictatorship that uses Repressive Tolerance to justify telling only one narrative,” wrote user @jamft in a tweet. “Twitter is no longer a platform, it has become a publisher and a gatekeeper.”
“This is not regulating them. This is taking away monetary and legal privilege they receive by claiming to be merely a “public platform.” They, if indeed they ever were, have ceased to be such and should lose that privilege,” wrote Twitter user @ChiefScribe.
“Competition doesn’t exist. Competitors can’t even get a mobile app because Apple and Google won’t allow it. Its a monopoly,” Twitter user @steph93065 wrote in another response.
Rubin is acting like his so-called competitor to Twitter, Locals.com, is free market competition that will reign in the social media giants without government interference.
However, banished journalist and Congressional candidate Laura Loomer pointed out that Rubin’s platform subscribes to all of the same rules as the tech giants and does not really promote freedom of speech.
“I find it really bizarre how Dave Rubin is going around telling people that his new social media site is anti censorship when it’s been designed to keep deplatformed people off and also utilizes the same content moderation tools as Twitter,” she wrote in a Telegram post.
“How do you have a social media site created to supposedly combat censorship and then not invite anyone who has actually been deplatformed onto the site? How can you claim to not have “behind the scenes censorship” when you let people “control who can and can’t post”?” Loomer asked.
Loomer urges patriots who oppose Big Tech censorship to join Parler, a social media entity that refuses to bow to Big Tech’s arbitrary rules and allows unpersoned individuals to speak freely on their platform.
“It is very dishonest for this new site to be advertised as a solution to censorship,” Loomer wrote of Rubin’s social media scam site. “I believe that’s what you call false advertising.”
Rubin’s half-baked weak libertarianism is not selling like it did several years ago. The homosexual former leftist “Young Turks” collaborator is showing signs that he may be controlled opposition for the globalist establishment.
Trending on BLP
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Half a Million Sign Petition Refusing Mandatory Coronavirus Vaccine
States3 days ago
Gretchen Whitmer’s Regime Sued to Keep Water Levels High in Months Leading Up to Michigan Dam Break
The Swamp4 days ago
REPORT: Michigan Governor Whitmer’s Husband Sought Boat Launching During State of Emergency
The Swamp4 days ago
Judge Prolonging Michael Flynn’s Court Case Hires Lawyer, As Appeals Court Demands Explanation
Tech2 days ago
Facebook Mass Censoring Any MENTION of the Word ‘Coronavirus’
The Swamp4 days ago
Never Trump Losers Plotting ‘Counter-Convention’ to Whine About GOP During RNC
Big League Wellness1 day ago
Indian Scientists Discover Hydroxychloroquine Treatment Prevents COVID-19, Vindicating President Trump
States3 days ago
Virginia’s Ralph Northam Caught At Beach Without Facemask, Social Distancing