Connect with us

Campaign 2020

PROJECTION: Pelosi Claims Trump Will Not ‘Respect the Election’ Following 2020

After spending years to undermine the 2016 presidential election, Pelosi claims Trump will do so after the 2020 Presidential election.

Published

on

Pelosi Tells Audience Thats An Applause Line

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has made a shocking claim that President Donald Trump will refuse to accept the election results in 2020 if he loses to his Democrat challenger.

The baseless claim made by the House Majority Speaker follows years of Democrat officials refusing to accept the legal and lawful election results in 2016 when Trump defeated Crooked Hillary in unexpected fashion. Pelosi made the claim without a hint of irony.

“If we win by four seats, by a thousand votes each, he’s not going to respect the election,” the chutzpah-laden Congresswoman said. “We have to inoculate against that, we have to be prepared for that.”

Trending: North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes

“He would poison the public mind. He would challenge each of the races; he would say ‘you can’t seat these people,'” she added.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Pelosi claims that the Democrats “had to win” in 2018 in order to save the socialist agenda that she has been promoting during her decades as a career politician in Washington D.C.

“Imagine if we hadn’t won – oh, don’t even imagine. So, as we go forward, we have to have the same approach,” she said.

“Our passions were for health care, bigger paychecks, cleaner government – a simple message,” Pelosi added.

While advocating for socialism, Pelosi created some distance between radicals in her midst such as Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) who are essentially advocating for radical communism.

“We did not engage in some of the other exuberances that exist in our party,” she said.

Despite the fact that Pelosi believes that President Trump has “demonstrated on a daily basis his obstruction of justice,” she refuses to endorse impeachment measures.

“You’re wasting your time, unless the evidence is so conclusive that the Republicans will understand,” Pelosi said to the USA Today. “Otherwise, it’s a gift to the president. We take our eye off the ball.”

This has caused some prominent Democrats to begin turning on their entrenched leader.

“I felt she was rushing to judgment without all the information being in,” pro-impeachment billionaire donor Tom Steyer said. “She was, in effect, handing a veto to all the Republicans in terms of holding Mr. Trump to account.”

“I think even if we did not win, possibly, if there were not impeachment, I think history would smile upon us for standing up for the Constitution,” said Elijah Cummings (D-MD), who serves as the chair of the House Oversight Committee, to CBS’ Face the Nation.

“On the GOP standard we would have impeached Trump a long time ago for his hush money payoffs to his various mistresses in a way that violated campaign finance law,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said.

While Pelosi likes to make Trump an easy bogeyman, she is unwilling to risk much political capital to stop him in her role as House Speaker. She can criticize her opposition, but until she can get a hold of her own party, looking forward to unseating Trump in 2020 may be putting the cart before the horse.

Campaign 2020

Presidential Debates Set to Ignore National Security, Immigration, and Second Amendment

Ignoring the issues important to Americans.

Published

on

The 2020 presidential debates are now guaranteed to ignore the critical national political topics of immigration and the Second Amendment, with only a passing discussion on national security.

In a remarkably biased favor to the Joe Biden campaign, moderator Kristen Welker de-emphasized foreign policy as a planned topic of the third debate, structuring it around a reliable list of leftist-friendly topics. The planned topics are the pandemic, race relations, climate change, national security & “leadership,” a colored term for Welker castigating the President over what she sees as mean tweets.

SV News has reported that Welker has scrapped foreign policy questions alltogether after the revelation of Hunter Biden’s corrupt dealings involving his father with Burisma.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The third (de facto second) presidential debate will include yet another segment on “Race in America,” in which a leftist moderator will harangue the President on the existence of supposed “white supremacist” groups and demand the bow to the elitist lie of “white privilege.”

Immigration was entirely ignored during the first presidential debate, and it seems more than likely that it’ll be swept under the rug during this one, unless President Trump goes out of the way to mention his policy accomplishments on the matter. The Second Amendment has been wholly ignored, as well.

Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien penned a letter to what he termed the BDC (Biden Debate Commission) questioning as to why the traditional focus on foreign policy in the third presidential debate was being replaced, at the very moment Hunter Biden’s highly suspicious personal foreign business dealings have been placed under scrutiny.

More than 50% of American citizens describe both these issues as “very important” in recent polling- more so than climate change and “race and ethnic inequality.” Yet, seemingly endless racial conversations have been featured at both presidential debates, and expounded upon at length at both electoral town halls last week.

Joe Biden has promised that he will not deport any illegal aliens, except for those convicted of violent felonies. This would represent a dramatic repudiation of American immigration law in itself, and could lead to truly massive new levels of illegal immigration. This stands to be totally ignored in the debate process.

It’s time to scrap the biased Commission on Presidential Debates. These events should be conducted with one liberal journalist and one conservative journalist, as opposed to corporate news hacks who masquerade as “neutral” while arranging a leisurely walk in the park for the pro-establishment Democrat candidate.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending