Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has made a shocking claim that President Donald Trump will refuse to accept the election results in 2020 if he loses to his Democrat challenger.
The baseless claim made by the House Majority Speaker follows years of Democrat officials refusing to accept the legal and lawful election results in 2016 when Trump defeated Crooked Hillary in unexpected fashion. Pelosi made the claim without a hint of irony.
“If we win by four seats, by a thousand votes each, he’s not going to respect the election,” the chutzpah-laden Congresswoman said. “We have to inoculate against that, we have to be prepared for that.”
“He would poison the public mind. He would challenge each of the races; he would say ‘you can’t seat these people,'” she added.
Pelosi claims that the Democrats “had to win” in 2018 in order to save the socialist agenda that she has been promoting during her decades as a career politician in Washington D.C.
“Imagine if we hadn’t won – oh, don’t even imagine. So, as we go forward, we have to have the same approach,” she said.
“Our passions were for health care, bigger paychecks, cleaner government – a simple message,” Pelosi added.
While advocating for socialism, Pelosi created some distance between radicals in her midst such as Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) who are essentially advocating for radical communism.
“We did not engage in some of the other exuberances that exist in our party,” she said.
Despite the fact that Pelosi believes that President Trump has “demonstrated on a daily basis his obstruction of justice,” she refuses to endorse impeachment measures.
“You’re wasting your time, unless the evidence is so conclusive that the Republicans will understand,” Pelosi said to the USA Today. “Otherwise, it’s a gift to the president. We take our eye off the ball.”
This has caused some prominent Democrats to begin turning on their entrenched leader.
“I felt she was rushing to judgment without all the information being in,” pro-impeachment billionaire donor Tom Steyer said. “She was, in effect, handing a veto to all the Republicans in terms of holding Mr. Trump to account.”
“I think even if we did not win, possibly, if there were not impeachment, I think history would smile upon us for standing up for the Constitution,” said Elijah Cummings (D-MD), who serves as the chair of the House Oversight Committee, to CBS’ Face the Nation.
“On the GOP standard we would have impeached Trump a long time ago for his hush money payoffs to his various mistresses in a way that violated campaign finance law,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said.
While Pelosi likes to make Trump an easy bogeyman, she is unwilling to risk much political capital to stop him in her role as House Speaker. She can criticize her opposition, but until she can get a hold of her own party, looking forward to unseating Trump in 2020 may be putting the cart before the horse.
Presidential Debates Set to Ignore National Security, Immigration, and Second Amendment
Ignoring the issues important to Americans.
The 2020 presidential debates are now guaranteed to ignore the critical national political topics of immigration and the Second Amendment, with only a passing discussion on national security.
In a remarkably biased favor to the Joe Biden campaign, moderator Kristen Welker de-emphasized foreign policy as a planned topic of the third debate, structuring it around a reliable list of leftist-friendly topics. The planned topics are the pandemic, race relations, climate change, national security & “leadership,” a colored term for Welker castigating the President over what she sees as mean tweets.
SV News has reported that Welker has scrapped foreign policy questions alltogether after the revelation of Hunter Biden’s corrupt dealings involving his father with Burisma.
JUST IN: Presidential Debate Commission ditches foreign policy topic from debate, following Hunter Biden email scandal.
— SV News 🚨 (@SVNewsAlerts) October 19, 2020
The third (de facto second) presidential debate will include yet another segment on “Race in America,” in which a leftist moderator will harangue the President on the existence of supposed “white supremacist” groups and demand the bow to the elitist lie of “white privilege.”
Immigration was entirely ignored during the first presidential debate, and it seems more than likely that it’ll be swept under the rug during this one, unless President Trump goes out of the way to mention his policy accomplishments on the matter. The Second Amendment has been wholly ignored, as well.
Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien penned a letter to what he termed the BDC (Biden Debate Commission) questioning as to why the traditional focus on foreign policy in the third presidential debate was being replaced, at the very moment Hunter Biden’s highly suspicious personal foreign business dealings have been placed under scrutiny.
Our letter to the BDC (Biden Debate Commission) pic.twitter.com/ZsY5JfMbT7
— BillStepien (@BillStepien) October 19, 2020
More than 50% of American citizens describe both these issues as “very important” in recent polling- more so than climate change and “race and ethnic inequality.” Yet, seemingly endless racial conversations have been featured at both presidential debates, and expounded upon at length at both electoral town halls last week.
Joe Biden has promised that he will not deport any illegal aliens, except for those convicted of violent felonies. This would represent a dramatic repudiation of American immigration law in itself, and could lead to truly massive new levels of illegal immigration. This stands to be totally ignored in the debate process.
It’s time to scrap the biased Commission on Presidential Debates. These events should be conducted with one liberal journalist and one conservative journalist, as opposed to corporate news hacks who masquerade as “neutral” while arranging a leisurely walk in the park for the pro-establishment Democrat candidate.
ANTIFA3 days ago
Cops Stand Down as ANTIFA Terrorists Attack Trump Supporters at Rally in Ithaca, NY
Tech3 days ago
Supreme Court Justices Slam Google in Copyright Case That Could Break Up Their Tech Monopoly
Big League Wellness4 days ago
Dr. Anthony Fauci Rejects the Settled Science, Comes out Against Implementation of Effective Swedish Model
Around The World4 days ago
South Africa: Another White Farmer’s Savage Murder Sparks Demonstrations at Courthouse
Campaign 20204 days ago
WATCH: Joe Biden Defends 8-Year-Old Transgender Children at Town Hall Discussion
Crime3 days ago
L.A. County Transfers up to $14 Million from Cops to Illegal Migrants
Congress4 days ago
WATCH: Dan ‘McCain 2.0’ Crenshaw Calls Himself an ‘Environmentalist’ and Says ‘Climate Change is Real’
Tech4 days ago
Twitter Alters “Hacked Materials” Censorship Policy After Hunter Biden Backlash