Rush Limbaugh said that Michael Avenatti’s third accuser represents the “Jumping the Shark” moment in the Brett Kavanaugh case.
A conservative millennial woman named Hannah called into Rush’s show Wednesday to discuss Friday’s Kavanaugh vote: Are Republicans confident they have the votes even with RINO’s Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Jeff Flake prowling around the Senate?
Rush said that he thinks Grassley is confident the vote will pass, or else he would not have scheduled it. But Rush was also skeptical of Collins, Murkowski and Flake.
The deputy Washington bureau chief of the Wall Street Journal actually appeared on Fox News during the afternoon to call the Avenatti claims “horrifying” and meriting of an investigation.
A woman named Jenny in Wyoming told Rush Limbaugh Tuesday that she was in the same residential college at Yale University as Brett Kavanaugh, the President Trump Supreme Court nominee who is fending off unsubstantiated sexual impropriety claims from two accusers.
The woman said that two reporters including a reporter from the Huffington Post called her regarding Kavanaugh, and described how the reporters used leading questions to dig up “dirt” on Kavanaugh. (RELATED: Phone Audio: CNN Producer Cold-Calling Brett Kavanaugh’s Yale Classmates).
“So if I had to describe Brett Kavanaugh that I knew from 1983 through 1987, I would describe him with one word as “kind.” He is kind, he is gentle, he was gracious, he was thoughtful. He was never somebody I would ever think of as a quote “partier.” He was a good man, and I’m just offended that all of this coming out. I don’t associate that at all with the person that I knew,” Jenny said.
“Absolutely not. Absolutely not. And if there had been, I would have known because it was a small group of people. No! He was just a normal, nice guy,” Jenny said when Rush asked her if people ever warned her to be careful of Kavanaugh.
What Jenny said next reveals the strategy of the anti-Trump and anti-Kavanaugh mainstream media.
“I even had two reporters contact me. The Huffington Post called me yesterday and it’s so strange ’cause I live in Wyoming out in the middle of nowhere and reporters do not usually call me of all people,” Jenny said.
“They’re trying to get dirt on him,” Jenny said.
“I’ve had this happen once over the summer, and the person who called — the reporter — in the middle of the summer, when I wasn’t able to give her any dirt, she started to lead me, just like leading the witness. She started suggesting terrible things that I should say about him, and when I wasn’t able to do that she started leading me down the road. “Can I say anything negative about the groups that he participated in, you know, the clubs that he was a part of while he was at Yale?” Again, I wouldn’t say anything negative about them as well. I didn’t have anything negative to say but he was really offended. The reporters are calling me, of all people, to get negative things to come up with, and it really makes me suspicious that these women who are coming forward have had something similar to them done to them as well, that somebody’s leading them and spurring them on and urging them,” Jenny said.
“Honestly, I sort of directed the conversation earlier than giving her a chance to do that. It was a very young girl. I did ask her age. She was 28 and I was thinking, “This girl doesn’t know anything. She wasn’t even around during the Clinton era. She (unintelligible) history here,” and when I talked with her about it I turned around all the questions back onto her and asked her…” Jenny said.
“So I talked about how the reporter who had called me in the summer had been very manipulative and was leading. I asked her, “What does it mean to be a journalist and are you trying to create the news that you want to hear or are you actually asking about it and wanting to learn something honest and true and what is true?” So I think I probably surprised her with some of that. But (crosstalk) —,” Jenny said, according to the Rush Limbaugh Show transcripts.
“Well, the reply to that was that we have to protect these women and that they have rights, too, from the angle of defending the woman. I talked about how in my opinion Brett Kavanaugh is the victim. He is truly the one being victimized, and I asked her how it would feel if you had worked all of your life and been a good person and had been conscientious and had done the right thing and had done something, a certain moment in your career been attacked wrongly, wrongly accused and how that would make her feel. Her response was that (garbled), well, he would still have a good job anyway,” Jenny said.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Appeals Court Refuses to Expunge Joe Arpaio’s Contempt Conviction After Presidential Pardon
A judge isn’t happy about the pardon.
A federal appeals court is refusing to expunge former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpario’s contempt of court conviction, after the sheriff was granted a presidential pardon by President Trump.
Such a legal move is rare if not unprecedented for the recipient of a presidential pardon. Usually federal and state court systems dismiss the convictions of people granted presidential pardon.
Arpaio was convicted of contempt of court in 2017 for refusing to change the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department’s practices after a judge mandated that the agency cease immigration raids.
Three judges of the liberal San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court upheld a ruling from a lower circuit court refusing to expunge the legal record of Arpaio’s conviction. The move sets new legal precedent for a recipient of a presidential pardon.
Arpaio was a frequent target of Eric Holder and the Obama administration, often coming under intense DOJ scrutiny for the practices of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department.
Arpaio ran for the United States Senate in 2018, coming in third in the Republican Primart behind Martha McSally and Kelli Ward. He’s now running for his old position as Maricopa County Sheriff once more at the ripe age of 87.
In any case, presidential pardons have traditionally resulted in dismissal of criminal convictions in federal and state courts. It’s hard to think of the 9th Circuit’s decision to maintain the conviction as anything more than a political slight to President Trump.
Big League National Security4 days ago
FLASHBACK: Italian Media Exposed Chinese Experiments to Infect Humans with Coronavirus in 2015
News4 days ago
FBI Discovered a “Biosecurity Risk” in Airport Luggage From China Back in 2018
News4 days ago
Democrat Who Gave Husband Fish Tank Cleaner and Blamed Trump Had History of Domestic Abuse
Around The World4 days ago
CLOWNWORLD: Imported Coronavirus Testing Kits Found to be Contaminated with Coronavirus
Hollywood3 days ago
Hollywood Abuser Amber Heard Fired From ‘Aquaman 2’ After Domestic Violence Admission
Violent Left3 days ago
ANTIFA Terrorists Give Tips on How to Break Into Homes During Coronavirus Pandemic
Deep State2 hours ago
ACCOUNTABILITY: President Trump Fires Deep State Snitch Who Triggered Impeachment Hysteria
Tech4 days ago
Facebook Censors Project Veritas Video, Keeping Coronavirus Hysteria in High Gear