Connect with us

Politics

Sean Davis: Mueller Showed He’s Political Hitman, Believes in Guilty Until Proven Innocent for Trump

The Federalist’s co-founder took Mueller to task in his latest article.

Published

on

Mueller Sean Davis

Co-founder of The Federalist Sean Davis exposed former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s actions reveal him to be a political hitman who viewed his commission as an opportunity to take down the lawfully elected president.

The Federalist‘s co-founder took Mueller to task in a scathing article earlier today, deconstructing his clown-like performance over the last two years and up through this morning’s press conference bit by bit.

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1133805290443419648?s=21

Trending: CHILLING: Former FBI Official and MSNBC Host Float Creating False Flags to Entrap White ‘Extremists’

Davis writes that Mueller began his prepared statement this morning by telling the public that it is important for the Mueller report to speak for itself, as it has been pored over for weeks since its April release, to which Davis rhetorically asks “then why did Mueller schedule a press conference in which he would speak for it weeks after it was released?”

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

According to Davis, Mueller’s statement then becomes “self refuting.”

Davis expands that Mueller seems to believe Russian agents have a greater protection under United States law than President Donald Trump, as Mueller specifically notes that “Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.” However, Mueller does not extend this same basic legal foundation to the president, instead creating a new standard in which President Trump is to be presumed guilty until Mueller or another prosecutor determines otherwise.

“The order appointing the special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of our work,” Mueller said. “After that investigation, if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”

According to Mueller and his team, charged Russians are presumed innocent. An American president, however, is presumed guilty unless and until Mueller’s team determines he is innocent. Such a standard is an obscene abomination against the rule of law, one that would never be committed by independent attorneys who place a fidelity to their oaths and impartial enforcement of the law ahead of their political motivations.

Mueller then went on to say that “It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge,” which Davis says Mueller clearly cannot believe, as if it were true the second, 240-page part of the Mueller report, focusing solely on possible obstruction of justice, would never have been authored.

“After all, according to Mueller’s own statement, such an operation would be patently unfair,” writes Davis.

This behavior, in Davis’s view, shows that Mueller is “little more than a clone of James Comey—the smarmy, scheming politician who replaced Mueller as the head of the FBI,” and “a scheming political operative.”

Mueller’s performance made it clear for all to see that what he ran for the last two years wasn’t an independent investigation pursuant to the rule of law so much as an inquisition motivated by political animus. Mueller and his team refused to charge prominent Democrats for crimes he charged against Republicans. Paul Manafort was charged with unregistered lobbying for foreign governments, while Mueller left alone long-time Democrat donor Tony Podesta and former Obama White House Counsel Greg Craig.

In short, Davis summarily defines Mueller as a partisan Democrat who used his power in an obvious attempt to delegitimize Republicans and President Trump whenever possible, while ignoring the possible crimes committed by high profile Democrats, even while those potential crimes may be equally or more severe than those imaginary ones committed by the president and his team.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

You Might Like

Campaign 2020

Senator Tim Scott Predicts “50% Increase” In Black Support for Trump in 2020

Such a shift would be a game changer.

Published

on

South Carolina Senator Tim Scott is predicting a “50% increase” in support for Donald Trump in the 2020 election.

Scott made the prediction in an interview with Fox News’ Neil Cavuto on Friday.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

President Trump will see a 50 percent increase in his African-American support. It will go from 8 percent in 2016 to a minimum of 12 percent in 2020. He may even get to 15 percent of the African American vote, and that is game over.”

Such a small slice of the black vote may seem small, but it very well could prove enough to be impactful in swing states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania. Scott pointed to President Trump’s performance on economic policy as a possible factor in drawing black support to the GOP in 2020.

“[Trump] had an executive order to increase affordability of home ownership, and African American home ownership since he took office is up about 2%… President Trump is not just talking a good game, he is walking a good game.”

Scott pointed to the possibility of a Michael Bloomberg nomination alienating some Black Americans from the Democratic Party.

African Americans have been one of the most consistent voting blocs for the Democratic Party since the 1960’s. Some blacks are concerned that they’re not a priority for the Democratic Party in an era where the party has made generous policy concessions to various demographic groups.

A realignment of some Black Americans into the Republican Party wouldn’t be without precedent in American history. African Americans originally strongly supported the reconstruction-era Republican Party when they were granted voting rights(in theory) after the Civil War. The first black U.S Senator and House Representative was a Republican.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


You Might Like

Trending