Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Snowflakes

Senate Holds Hearing on Free Speech on College Campuses

Published

on

Students and law professors testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday regarding the issue of free speech on college campuses, during times when left wing rioters in black bloc have been showing up and violently preventing right wing speakers from appearing.

During the hearing, titled “Free Speech 101: The Assault on the First Amendment on College Campuses,” California Senator Dianne Feinstein opened a line of questioning referencing a Southern Poverty Law Center paper on “the Battle for Berkeley” and the “alt-right.”

“I wanted to ask Mr. Cohen, um, this question — um — I’m holding a copy of a May 1, 2017 paper from the SPLC — the title of which is ‘The Battle for Berkeley in the Name of Freedom of Speech, the Radical Right is Circling the Ivory Tower to Ensure a Voice for the Alt-Right’ uh, could you please describe for us the thrust of this paper and any comments you care to make?” Feinstein asked.

Trending: Conservative Teen Activist CJ Pearson Challenges David Hogg To A 1-On-1 Basketball Game

Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, responded that at Berkeley, as protests have escalated, so has the presence of groups with violence on their minds — such as antifa. He quickly shifted from discussing the violent left to “right wing” radical groups, despite the fact that they are not aggressors, but defenders, of free speech.

“In response to them [antifa] we have had groups such as Oathkeepers, current and former law enforcement officials, who take a pledge to uphold the Constitution in their view — not as might be interpreted by the courts or their superiors. We have had other radical right groups — the Proud Boys — a new group called the ‘Alt Knights’ come to college campuses really raring for a fight. My sympathy goes out to university officials at Berkeley because they have been faced with an increasingly incendiary situation,” Cohen added.

Feinstein, a ranking member of the committee, said that one of her issues is that universities are expected to have the resources to know how to handle such clashes. She asked the panel how they believed that issue should be tackled.

Eugene Volokh, a professor at UCLA School of Law, who teaches laws surrounding free speech responded, with several interruptions from Feinstein, that he appreciates resource constraints, but added that “if we are in a position where our police departments are unable to protect free speech, whether at universities or otherwise, yes indeed we are in a very bad position.”

Feinstein interrupted again, incorrectly claiming that Volokh was making the argument that universities are responsible for handling the situation, no matter how “bad” the speaker is. The witness was actually stating that while there are campus police, there are also local city police who are also responsible for assisting with protecting speakers’ free speech — and that therefore the burden does not fall solely on university administrations.

“You’re making the argument that a speaker that might fulminate a big problem should never be refused. They ought to be able to come, whatever the problem is, it out to be handled,” Feinstein said.

Volokh responded that there could be extraordinary cases in which a speaker should be cancelled, such as if someone had “planted a bomb.”

Feinstein, appearing content with allowing free speech rights to be trampled by black bloc, stated that  “to me the extraordinary circumstance is when people come in black uniforms and hit other people over the head — that’s an extraordinary circumstance.” Her comments had a tone of victim blaming, suggesting that it is always the speakers fault for violent responses to their words.

Volokh responded saying, “right, and that cannot be enough to justify suppression of those whom they came to try to suppress. It’s not just the university, it’s the government — one important job of the government is to prevent violence without suppressing free speech.”

In May, a former professor was arrested for hitting a Trump supporter on the head with a bike lock during a free speech rally the month before. Eric Clanton, formerly of Diablo Valley College, had shown up to the event in black bloc attire including most of his face being covered. His identity was unknown until the messageboard 4chan tracked him down.

“You don’t think we learned a lesson at Kent State, way back when?” Senator Dianne Feinstein asked.

Frederick Lawrence, Secretary and CEO of the Phi Beta Kappa Society, interjected that universities do not always have the resources to handle a riot, but that there always needs to be an effort to find a way to facilitate a speaker that a student group has invited.

“No matter how radical, offensive, biased, prejudiced — fascist — the program is, you should find a way to accommodate it?” Feinstein asked incredulously.

“If we are talking about the substance of a program, not the danger and credible threats, but the substance of the program — then yes — if a student group invites then they should be able to,” Lawrence responded . He added that he tells critics of his support of free speech to trust his students to ask the right questions if there is a controversial speaker.

Feinstein claimed that it isn’t always the student groups who are behind speakers, but outside groups who have an intention to “disturb and hurt.”

Lawrence argued that private universities can choose to allow only students to attend the event, but conceded that public universities face other challenges.

“I think particularly in view the divisions within this nation at this time — which are extraordinary from my experience — I think we all have to protect the general welfare too. I appreciate free speech,” Feinstein said with a laugh. “Those of us who run for office run on the basis of being able to speak freely. But, it’s another thing to agitate, it’s another thing to foment, and it’s another thing to attack.”

Lawrence responded saying that a president should take into account whether or not a speaker is coming to the campus for the purpose of agitating, saying speakers who “post images of students on screens in an attempt to intimidate or humiliate” have no place on a university campus, in reference to Milo Yiannopoulos.

Earlier in the hearing, Senator Ted Cruz took a strong and passionate stand to defend the freedom of speech.

“If universities become homogenizing institutions that are focused on inculcating and indoctrinating rather than challenging, we will lose what makes universities great,” Cruz said. “The First Amendment is about opinions that you passionately disagree with and the right of others to express them.”

Cruz also placed blame on university officials, asserting that they have become complicit in allowing heckler’s vetoes to shut down speech.

“College administrators and faculties have become complicit in functioning essentially as speech police – deciding what speech is permissible and what speech isn’t,” Cruz said. “You see violent protests … enacting effectively a heckler’s veto where violent thugs come in and say ‘this particular speaker, I disagree with what he or she has to say. And therefore, I will threaten physical violence if the speech is allowed to happen.”

The senator added that those who seek to shut down opposing views are just afraid of their own views being challenged.

“What an indictment of our university system,” Cruz stated. “If ideas are strong, if ideas are right, you don’t need to muzzle the opposition. You should welcome the opposition. When you see college faculties and administrators being complicit or active players in silencing those with opposing views, what they are saying is they are afraid.”

It is easy to defend speech that nobody is offended by, and is not what the First Amendment was made for, Cruz correctly pointed out.

“The Nazis are grotesque, and repulsive, and evil. And under our Constitution they have a right to speak, and the rest of us have a moral obligation to denounce what they say,” Cruz said. “The Ku Klux Klan are a bunch of racist, bigoted, thugs who have a right to express their views. And we have an obligation, then, to confront those views – which are weak, poisonous, and wrong – and confront them with truth.”

Cruz was getting at the fact that the best way to combat offensive free speech isn’t violence, but more speech — and civil discussion.

“We don’t need to use brute force to silence them, because truth is more powerful than force.”

Cassandra Fairbanks is a senior reporter at Big League Politics and a DC-based writer and populist political commentator who has been published in a range of outlets including Sputnik News, Teen Vogue, and the International Business Times.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Immigration

COULTER: Detained Illegals Are “Being Separated From Coyotes and Drug Mules”

Published

on

Author and pundit Ann Coulter was confronted by a TMZ cameraman today, and the result was not pretty for the paparazzo.

“The biggest thing is these kids are being separated from their parents,” said the cameraman posing a lefty journalist

Coulter responded in her usual ruthless manner.

“They’re being separated from coyotes and drug mules, that has already been proven before” she said.

WATCH:

Coulter continued to savage her adversary.

“The parents can stay in Mexico,” she said. “You don’t get to get out of committing crimes in this country because you have a baby. I mean, why don’t we let out Bernie Madoff. His kids suffered. One committed suicide.”

The activist then brought up the First Ladies who have denounced President Donald J. Trump’s zero tolerance policy.

“Thank God First Ladies aren’t elected officials,” Coulter replied with a grin.

When asked if she thought this would be a “stain on our country’s history,” Coulter delivered her knockout blow.

“It’s going to be the END of our country’s history if we let these hordes in,” she said. “It will never, never stop.”

Continue Reading

Culture

WaPo Employees Beg Bezos for Raise

Published

on

More than 400 employees at the Washington Post have signed an open letter to owner Jeff Bezos demanding better working conditions after more than a year of failed negotiations with upper management.

“[Dear Jeff Bezos] we workers of The Washington Post have been bargaining for a year and have little to show for it because The Post won’t meet us halfway on much of anything,” says a tweet shared by the Post Guild. “We love The Post. We know you do too. Our work has earned us more than what The Post is offering.”

According to Deadlinesignees of the letter include prominent employees like White House reporter Ashley Parker and political reporter Dave Weigel.

Bezos is the founder, chairman, and CEO of Amazon. His estimated net worth is nearly $142 billion. He bought the paper in 2013.

The left-wing culture that has engulfed the Washington Post has spilled over into the office, and come back to bite Bezos. His employees are calling on him to “share the wealth” that they claim to have created.

“All we are asking for is fairness for each and every employee who contributed to this company’s success: fair wages; fair benefits for retirement, family leave and health care; and a fair amount of job security,” the petition says.

The staff accompanied the petition with a video.

WATCH:

“I’m fighting for equal pay, because regardless of gender or skin color, we all deserve to be paid the same,” said a compilation of employees in the video.

The sword of social justice appears to be turning inward on the Washington Post. 

Continue Reading

Culture

See How This Trump Supporter Trolled De Niro At His Own Play

Published

on

A little more than a week after his vulgar anti-Trump rant at the Tony Awards, actor Robert de Niro was repaid in kind at the curtain call of his version of “A Bronx Tale,” the Broadway show.

In the style coined by independent reporter Laura Loomer, a man stood up at the end of the show, rushing the stage with a “Keep America Great” flag. De Niro is the director of the show.

“The times we live in,” wrote Joe Del Vicario, who was at the show. “At the end of A Bronx Tale, a man turned around and faced the audience to show us how big of a pair he has. He was escorted shortly after. It’s sad that people can’t enjoy a beautiful show and embrace its unifying message without politicizing it.”

 

But politicizing shows is nothing new for the left. In November 2016, a cast member of Broadway Musical “Hamilton” lectured Vice President Mike Pence after the show. Pence was booed while exiting the theatre.

WATCH:

“We, sir, we are the diverse American who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us.” said a cringeworthy Brandon Victor Dixon on stage.

After the show, Dixon continued injecting his politics into Broadway.

“We really thought this was an important moment to really say something,” he said. “To get in front of an individual with whom we feel we have differences and to make sure that he hears and he sees us.”

According to the new rules set by the left, yesterday’s “A Bronx Tale” protest is simply par for the course. The protestor, after all, was just getting in front of someone with whom he disagrees, right?

No surprise that the left does not want to play by the rules it has created.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Send this to a friend