Connect with us

Tech

Study: Twitter Bans 21 Conservatives for 1 Liberal

Published

on

It’s no doubt that Twitter has devolved into an establishment-friendly censored platform in which right-leaning political thought is censored. The social media website was originally devised by its creators as a genuine free speech platform- a vision that was thrown to the winds when it became clear that open exchange of information was politically inconvenient to progressives.

A new study makes clear the extent to which the platform has gone to nuke conservative political expression in the past few years, under the leadership of Jack Dorsey. Columbia University academic Richard Hanania sought to document every suspension of a high profile-Twitter user since January.

Hanania identified 22 banned users who he categorized as influencers on the platform. Out of the 22, 21 were identified as known supporters of Donald Trump for President.

Trending: Wikipedia’s Founder is Creating New Free Speech Competitor to Website, Citing Leftist Domination

Only 1 high-profile liberal was identified as being (temporarily) banned- Rose McGowan. McGowan had been suspended after leaking someone’s private phone number, a clear violation of Twitter rules.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Hanania’s study only focused on widely followed accounts, and it’s likely that Twitter’s conservative-to-liberal suspension ratio would be even higher if his study documenting the site’s comprehensive ban policy.

Hanania noted that progressive Twitter users have escaped consequences for violating the platform’s terms of service. Examples included the New York Times’ Sarah Jeong, who was a source of embarrassment for the Times when her long track record of anti-white racial hatred surfaced shortly after being hired.

Jeong was never suspended, even though Twitter banned Candace Owens for facetiously repeating Jeong’s statements word-for-word towards other groups.

Another leading progressive to evade a Twitter ban was Kathy Griffin, who incited the public to doxx the identities of the falsely accused Covington Catholic boys.

Twitter’s mass implementation of censorship, which is applied in a far more punitive manner towards less prominent users of the platform, represents a fundamental shift from the original vision professed by the company. In 2012 a company executive had described Twitter as the “free speech wing of the free speech party.

Such a description of the platform in 2019 is frankly laughable. But the evolution of the company’s approach towards political speech is a telling example of Silicon Valley’s mass institution of censorship after 2016- an approach adopted in the heat of a establishment panic following Donald Trump’s election.

In hindsight, the vision of a free speech platform was only possible in what’s called the “golden age of the internet,” a term used by critics of big tech to describe a period of time from 2000 to 2014 when major social media platforms were generally more accountable to users than major corporations and government.

The vision of a decentralized internet has largely disappeared over the past several years, replaced by a model in which progressives and liberals in the seats of power of major tech institutions feel they have no choice but to implement mass censorship to shield their political beliefs from criticism.

An example of this is the widespread shuttering of comment sections across online news outlets.

The transformation of the internet into a curated and patrolled zone poses major threats to democracy in America and in the West, broadly.

Should the attempt to shut down criticism of progressive ideals online fail, it’s possible that liberals could seek to shut down democracy itself as an alternative.

Tech

Leaked Video Shows Tech Boss Describing How All Conservatives Will Be Frozen Out of the Market

They want conservatives to not be able to feed their families.

Published

on

A leaked video released by Project Veritas shows the CEO of Salesforce describing how all conservatives will be frozen out of the corporate-controlled marketplace with the Jan. 6 protests being used as the excuse to initiate this Draconian power-grab.

Salesforce President and COO Bret Taylor claimed that the organization would be cutting off individuals and organizations for expressing conservative speech, such as fighting for voter fraud accountability, because that speech is now designed as incitement. 

“What we’ve done in light of the events on Jan. 6, is recognize a much broader range of messages has the potential to incite politically-motivated violence, given what we saw. And so, as I mentioned, we’ve engaged with the RNC to communicate that no messages on behalf of President Trump and no messages questioning the validity or integrity of the election are allowed on our platform under the guidelines that they may incite violence given the escalated conditions in the United States right now,” Taylor explained in the recording to justify his censorship policy.

As a result of their policies, Project Veritas was dropped by Salesforce without any violation of terms of service listed. Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe claims that a whistleblower emerged just days after they announced Salesforce booting them, showing how the intrepid hidden camera journalist has eyes and ears everywhere within the corrupt China-dominated corporate system.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The leaked video from the Salesforce call shows how the globalist regime intends to choke conservatives out of the marketplace, and they won’t even need to microchip the peasants in order to enforce their system of total control. Taylor patted himself on the back for his company’s pioneering role in manifesting the Orwellian Nightmare.

“I just want to remind you of how we approach these questions at Salesforce. It’s something I think we do more thoughtfully than any technology company in the world. We have an Office of Ethical Humane Use of Technology,” Taylor said.

“We also have an Ethics Advisory Board made up of employees and external advisors to help guide us on questions like this. We have an Acceptable Use Policy. It governs the use of our products for every single one of our customers. And every decision we made this week, and every decision we will make is guided by this Office of Ethical and Humane Use, and our Acceptable Use Policy,” he added.

The full video can be seen here:

The video leaks from Salesforce show how Big Tech chieftains will pat themselves on the back as they enact Big Brother censorship and devastate the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending