Connect with us

Around The World

The Investigative Journal Launches Unprecedented Talk Show in NY, Drops Bombshell Revelation About Turkey’s Support for ISIS in Syria

Published

on

The Investigative Journal officially launched its uncompromisingly direct and honest talk show from its studios in Times Square New York last week during which award-winning broadcast journalist and anchor Tal Heinrich interviewed former Turkish Police Chief Ahmet S. Yayla who revealed his decision to leave the force after he discovered Turkey was directly funding and supporting Al Qaeda, its affiliates and the Islamic State in Syria over its opposition to Bashar al Assad.

“I had to leave my position because I did not accept what the Erdogan government was asking from me,” Yayla told Heinrich. “In fact, the government kept pressuring me to allow all those jihadis to pass through my city without being stopped or investigated, which I denied. And then, at the end, when he realized I was not going to be working with him to carry out the orders of the Erdogan government through the government in Şanlıurfa, I had to leave my position. I did my best to stop those jihadists but I was not allowed politically.”

The Investigative Journal (TIJ) is headed by CEO Mohamed Fadel Fahmy – an  Egyptian-Canadian award-winning journalist and author who has worked extensively in the Middle East – and produced by Driss Sekkat — an international award-winning executive producer and programming launch expert.

Trending: Leaked Video Shows Tech Boss Describing How All Conservatives Will Be Frozen Out of the Market

TIJ held its official launch in London several weeks ago and its U.S. operation out of New York is the newest addition to the company’s vision and aim of internationalizing the online platform’s dedicated to publishing in-depth investigations that dig to the core of issues that affect the public and its interests.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

TIJ’s interview with Yayla for its launch episode sets the tone for the type of hard-hitting journalism that the media publication has started to bring to the world.

Yayla Served as the chief of counterterrorism with the Turkish National Police for 20 years before going into self-imposed exile in Washington, D.C. where he teaches for Georgetown’s Center for Security Studies.

He told TIJ that Turkey began sending arms shipments to jihadists in Syria under the Erdogan government around 2010 and the first group Turkey supported was the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

“After the Arab Spring, the Erdogan government decided to have an extensive role in the conflict and with that, they started to support the jihadists who were fighting against Bashar al-Assad at the time,” referring to the FSA. “But once the Salafi Jihadists started to invade, those strongholds controlled by the Free Syrian Army militias the spectrum changed very fast,” because the FSA were not trained or equipped well and were losing the battle against the Salafi jihadists. “Therefore, they lost their ground very fast. With that, the international community stopped supporting them but Turkey increased its efforts to arm and support those groups. So, the support switched from the Free Syrian Army to the Salafi Jihadists,” included ISSI and Jabhat Al Nusra, or the Al Nusra Front.

Yayla said Erdogan worked directly with Turkish National Intelligence (which is MIT in Turkish) and the director of MIT at the time helped enable Erdogan both in Turkey and internationally. He detailed how the Turkish government intentionally turned a blind eye to jihadists crossing the border from and to Syria.

During the interview, Heinrich also referenced an extensive report by exiled Turkish journalist Abdullah Bozkurt who was able to map out the illegal weaponry sent from Turkey to Syria for use by jihadists and Al Qaeda, and Al Qaeda splinter groups including splinter groups in Iraq. Bozkurt noted in his groundbreaking report for TIJ that “On a weekly average, two or three shipments were delivered under the cover of night by trucks with no record of incoming air cargo at the airport logs. The operation often saw Qatari planes landing with arms in their cargo.”

Yayla revealed to Heinrich how the MIT was working with special agents, independently of the force, to distribute weapons to these Syrian rebel fighters. He added the MIT was also working with trucking companies to distribute weapons from Ankara and then dropping them off in Syria.

“Qatar is a direct supporter of Erdogan’s policies in the region,” Yayla said. “Erdogan and the Emir work together, hand in hand” adding that Qatar is responsible for providing the cash flow for those jihadists.

On a single day, ISIS smuggled anywhere between 50 to more than 100 jihadist militants into Turkey. The secret wiretaps that were revealed as part of Bozkurt’s investigation also revealed how in a one-month period in 2014 alone, 1,440 militants crossed into Syria through Turkey. During this same time period, ISIS smuggled 87 militants back into Turkey from Syria. These numbers and figures only represent one crossing point. Yayla said those numbers are actually much higher when taking into account other crossing points.

These same wiretaps proved that In 2014, the head of Turkish Intelligence Hakkan Fidan said he sent 2000 trucks loaded with weapons to jihadists in Syria after they demanded those weapons. “We sent around 2000 trucks. I will send four men to Syria if necessary. I will fire eight missiles toward Turkey to produce a justification for war. We should attack Suleyman Shah’s tomb.”

Asked why he thinks European countries aren’t pressing Erdogan more, Yayla said “Erdogan became the gatekeeper to ISIS and Al Qaeda for the Europeans and he blackmailed the Europeans through the EU with allowing all those terrorists into Europe. And they knew very well that if Erdogan wanted, he would let those terrorists pass through Turkey’s borders and go to Europe for different kinds of terrorist organizations.

Yayla attributed Erdogan’s support for these Islamists as being in line with his desire to become the leader of the Sunni Islamic world. “And he saw the conflict in Syria as an opportunity to grab that power,” Yayla said, attributing to what some refer to as “neo-Ottomanism.” He added that the second reason for Erdogan’s support of jihadists groups in Syria is because “he saw this as an opportunity to support the Muslim Brotherhood [Ikhwan] internationally, for his international political objectives” since his Salafi view of Islam is in line with the Brotherhood’s. “And if you look at where the Muslim Brotherhood’s centers are established today, they’re all in Turkey and Istanbul.”

He said Erdogan knew that supporting these groups and their ideologies in Syria would mean that he would eventually have control over Syria.

Yayla also referred to a report that was written for the European Union which studied the weapons and explosives of the Islamic State. “In that report we can exclusively see that almost all the IED materials, used by ISIS, were either provided by Turkey or they were purchased from Turkish companies. Even if those materials were not produced in Turkey, Turkish companies purchased them from international companies, brought them to Turkey and then sold them to ISIS. Think about it: ISIS killed thousands of people with its explosives.”

Around The World

Biden Authorizes Attack on Syria, Kamala FURIOUS It Wasn’t Her Call

Will Biden do a regime change in Syria?

Published

on

AMERICA IS BACK BABY!

You didn’t seriously think that after four years of peace in the Middle East, things were gonna stay that way, did you Jack? Well of course not! On Thursday afternoon, the Pentagon confirmed that the United States military had carried out airstrikes in Syria against facilities used by Iranian-backed militias. These groups have been operating in Syria for some time in their fight against the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda.

Pentagon Press Secretary Kirby gave the following statement:

“At President Biden’s direction, U.S. military forces earlier this evening conducted airstrikes against infrastructure utilized by Iranian-backed militant groups in eastern Syria. These strikes were authorized in response to recent attacks against American and Coalition personnel in Iraq, and to ongoing threats to those personnel. Specifically, the strikes destroyed multiple facilities located at a border control point used by a number of Iranian-backed militant groups, including Kait’ib Hezbollah (KH) and Kait’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada (KSS).

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This proportionate military response was conducted together with diplomatic measures, including consultation with Coalition partners. The operation sends an unambiguous message: President Biden will act to protect American and Coalition personnel. At the same time, we have acted in a deliberate manner that aims to de-escalate the overall situation in both eastern Syria and Iraq.”

According to conservative commentator Jack Posobiec, Vice President Harris was not included in the discussions about the bombing and is very upset that she wasn’t.

Many Twitter users are also pointing out the fact that Biden had fully condemned unannounced military action in the Middle East when it was Trump doing it.

According to the New York Post, the airstrikes were in response to recent attacks against US forces in Iraq. The militia groups targeted have denied any involvement in the attacks and there has been no confirmation as to whether or not they were involved. The New York Post wrote:

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It was not immediately clear if there were any deaths or injuries caused by the US strike, or the extent of damage it may have caused.

On Feb. 15, a rocket attack against a US military base at Erbil International Airport in Northern Iraq killed a US-led coalition contractor and left others wounded, including an American service member.

Two days later, a base hosting US forces north of Baghdad was targeted in another rocket attack, wounding at least one contractor.

On Monday rockets hit Baghdad’s Green Zone, which houses the US embassy and other diplomatic missions.

Earlier this week, the Kataib Hezbollah group, one of the main Iran-aligned Iraqi militia groups, denied any role in recent rocket attacks against U.S. targets in Iraq.

Some Western and Iraqi officials say the attacks, often claimed by little-known groups, are being carried out by militants with links to Kataib Hezbollah as a way for Iranian allies to harass US forces without being held accountable.

Fox New’s Tucker Carlson, who seems to be the only host on any cable news network that has been unquestionably anti-war for the past four years, gave a monologue Thursday night about his take on the attacks:


Follow me on Twitter @ZoomerJordan

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending