North Carolina voters will not need to have a valid photo ID for the March 3, 2020, Primary Election.
This came about after a December 31, 2019 order from a federal district court which blocked North Carolina’s voter ID law from going into effect. This injunction will stay in place until the court says otherwise.
Federal District Court Judge Loretta Biggs issued the order impeding the enforcement of North Carolina’s voter ID policy.
In the order, Judge Biggs declared that the voter ID requirement should be halted “with respect to any election, unless otherwise ordered by the court.”
To add insult to injury, the state of North Carolina spent nearly $100,000 of taxpayer dollars on 4.7 million copies of a document reminding North Carolina voters that they will not need to present voter ID during the March 2020 Primary Election.
Notice how the entire mailer is bilingual. English and Spanish. Given Republican concerns of non-citizens and illegal aliens committing voter fraud the choice to advertise NO ID REQUIRED in both English and Spanish is a curious decision by the state government.
Big League Politics obtained these exclusive photos.
Attorney General Josh Stein responded to this court order on January 2, 2020. Although the state plans to appeal the injunction, Stein would not request that photo ID policies be restored for the Primary “to avoid any further voter confusion.”
Consequently, registered voters are not expected to present photo ID to vote during the Primary.
Given this news, non-citizens including illegal aliens who wanted to vote could have a field day during the Primaries now that the state is no longer requiring photo ID before voting.
Voter ID is a commonsense policy to protect the integrity of elections.
North Carolina has previous experience with non-citizens voting in elections. Back in 2016, 19 noncitizens ranging from ages 26 to 71 voted in the 2016 General Election. These noncitizens hailed from countries such as Japan, Germany, Mexico, and Korea.
However, voter ID is only a steppingstone because the immigration question needs a more robust policy response.
Without strong border security and the abolition of both birthright citizenship and chain migration, U.S. institutions will be pushed over the edge.
At the very least, states can do their part by passing Voter ID laws.
Sadly, activist courts have overreached their constitutional bounds, which will necessitate a strong response from federal courts.
Starbucks Barista FIRED After Refusing to Wear “Pride” T-Shirt for Religious Reasons, According to Lawsuit
She is a Christian and was apparently told by her manager that she didn’t have to wear it.
A former Starbucks barista is filing an unlawful discrimination lawsuit against the coffee giant, claiming they fired her for refusing to wear a “Pride” t-shirt that violated her Christian religious convictions.
Betsy Fresse started working as a barista in December 2015. After transferring to a Glen Ridge, New Jersey, store in early 2019, managers apparently “assured” her that her Christian faith wouldn’t be an issue.
Then in June 2019, she noticed a box of Pride shirts on a desk and asked if they’d make her wear one. Her store manager said she wouldn’t have to, but two months later she found herself out of a job after being terminated by a district manager.
A notice of separation claims that Fresse was fired for violating Starbucks’ “core values.” It specifically mentions an incident where she said her colleagues “need Jesus” when given the “Pride” shirt.
Starbucks maintains that “no part of our dress code requires partners to wear any approved items that they have not personally selected” and that Fresse’s claims are “without merit,” in a comment to the New York Post.
So Starbucks denies that she was fired for not wearing the shirt, yet their notice of separation appears to claim that they fired her for something she said about Jesus. Not a good look either way.
Fresse is seeking backpay, punitive damages, money to cover the cost of an attorney, and a permanent injunction that prevents Starbucks from “failing to accommodate […] sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Starbucks has long been a major player in the world of Woke Capital. Back in February Big League Politics reported on how the British branch of Starbucks was raising money for a pro-transgender lobbying group:
The U.K. branch of Starbucks is raising money to push for the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children.
Nathanael Blake at The Federalist reported that the multinational titan is selling special mermaid-shaped cookies to help the pro-transgender lobbying group Mermaids. Curiously, the group’s founder took her underage son to Thailand to undergo a castration procedure.
Blake correctly observed “That Starbucks is supporting this group illustrates how thoroughly radicals have conquered both the LGBT movement and corporate culture.”
He also called attention to how “In a few years the fight has shifted from government recognition of same-sex relationships as legal marriages to mastectomies, sterilization, and castration for children.”
Here’s hoping that Betsy Fresse is successful in her lawsuit.
Culture4 days ago
HMM: Michelle Obama was Desperate Not to be Photographed in a Bikini as First Lady
Campaign 20204 days ago
President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators
Big League Wellness3 days ago
New Study Shows 84 Percent Decrease in Hospitalization Rates for COVID-19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine
Congress3 days ago
‘Let Them Be Free!’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Urges Trump to Pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange for Exposing ‘the Crimes of Barack Obama and the Deep State’
Campaign 20204 days ago
California Republicans Flip Third US House Seat from Democrats in 2020
States3 days ago
Illicit $25 Million Dominion Deal Set Up in Michigan by Former Democrat ‘Voter Protection’ Czar is Listed as Evidence in Kraken Lawsuit
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Los Angeles Enacts Full Coronavirus Lockdown for Three Weeks
Politics3 days ago
MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: James Mattis Bashes ‘America First’ as He Takes $$$ From Pro-China Lobbyists