Connect with us

Big League Wellness

TRUMP WAS RIGHT: Medical Study Proves That Hydroxychloroquine Lowers COVID-19 Death Rate

Henry Ford Health has made these discoveries.

Published

on

A study conducted by the Detroit-based Henry Ford Health System has determined that hydroxychloroquine treatment lowers the death rate for COVID-19 patients.

Officials with Henry Ford Health announced on Thursday that their study has shown that hydroxychloroquine “significantly” decreases the death rate of COVID-19 sufferers. They came to their conclusion after analyzing 2,541 patients who were confined in their hospital system from March 10 and May 2. They found that 13 percent of patients treated with hydroxychloroquine died while 26 percent of patients who did not receive the miracle drug died.

“As doctors and scientists, we look to the data for insight,” said Steven Kalkanis, CEO of the Henry Ford Medical Group. “And the data here is clear that there was a benefit to using the drug as a treatment for sick, hospitalized patients.”

Trending: Ex-Soviet Leader Gorbachev: US Capitol Riot “Planned in Advance, And It Is Clear by Whom”

There were also no heart-related problems that patients suffered from being treated with the drug in the study. Dr. Marcus Zervos noted that hydroxychloroquine is more effective when patients are treated with the drug early after their diagnosis with COVID-19.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“We attribute our findings that differ from other studies to early treatment, and part of a combination of interventions that were done in supportive care of patients, including careful cardiac monitoring,” said Zervos, who works as division head of infectious disease for Henry Ford Health. Zervos conducted the study with epidemiologist Dr. Samia Arshad.

“Our dosing also differed from other studies not showing a benefit of the drug,” he added. “We also found that using steroids early in the infection associated with a reduction in mortality.”

Zervos believes that the findings of this study could be crucial in stopping a potential second wave of COVID-19 infections from causing many more deaths.

Ever since President Trump suggested hydroxychloroquine as a remedy for COVID-19, there has been an institutional conspiracy to stop the treatment from being used to save the lives of the sick – as science and medicine have become extremely politicized.

Last month, Big League Politics reported on how a study about hydroxychloroquine’s fatal side effects was officially retracted after the data was shown to be erroneous:

The authors of a medical study published in medical journal The Lancet have been forced to retract their study claiming that hydroxychloroquine treatment had fatal side effects after several reports pointed out the faulty data.

The data was apparently used from a small Illinois firm called Surgisphere, owned by Dr. Sapan Desai. Desai had a sci-fi writer and a lewd model on staff for his company as the study was produced, and shockingly, it somehow produced inaccurate results.

The study was ultimately retracted after Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra, a Harvard Medical School professor who initially signed on to the study, tried to double check and verify the authenticity of the findings. Desai would not allow for the data to be re-analyzed, which eventually led to the retraction of the report.

“We launched an independent third-party peer review of Surgisphere with the consent of Sapan Desai to evaluate the origination of the database elements, to confirm the completeness of the database, and to replicate the analyses presented in the paper,” their statement said, according to the New York Times.

“Our independent peer reviewers informed us that Surgisphere would not transfer the full dataset, client contracts, and the full ISO audit report to their servers for analysis as such transfer would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements,” the authors added.

The disgraced World Health Organization (WHO) reportedly stopped research into hydroxychloroquine as treatment for COVID-19 because of the findings in this dubious report, adding to the laundry list of public health failures the globalist body has been responsible for throughout the coronavirus pandemic.

President Donald Trump has been vindicated for suggesting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 cure. His bold leadership has saved lives while many medical professionals have kept this lifesaving drug out of the hands of the sick.

Around The World

President Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor: Wuhan Lab is “Most Likely” Source of Chinese Coronavirus

Coronavirus may have emerged from a lab after all.

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor is speculating that the Chinese coronavirus disease escaped from a laboratory environment before spreading into mass circulation.

Matthew Pottinger, Deputy NSA since 2019, suggested that senior Chinese government officials had even come to realize that the disease emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology before entering the Huanan Wet Seafood Market. Epidemiologists originally suggested the virus came into existence at the market, where exotic animals were brought and sold in close proximity in an unsanitary fashion.

There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus,” Pottinger told British Members of Parliament in a Zoom conference last week.

Personnel of the World Health Organization are currently preparing for a comprehensive investigation into the origins of the coronavirus disease. Critics of the globalist organization- which is largely thought to be beholden to China- will cover up Chinese state malfeasance and dishonesty into the origins of the virus. An investigation into the devastating virus’ origins could have implications on preventing future outbreaks from escaping laboratory and research enviroments.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Chinese government has proposed a series of implausible theories alleging that the coronavirus epidemic originated in another country before entering China.

Scientific consensus indicates that COVID-19 evolved from bat viruses, first adapting to pangolins(an anteater-like creature) and mutating in a manner that made it capable of infecting humans. Scientists have broadly agreed on the virus’ zoonotic origins, while declining to decisively rule out the possibility of genetic engineering or laboratory curation.

The coronavirus escaping from a laboratory doesn’t necessarily entail the virus being “man-made.” It’s possible that scientists and researchers could’ve been collecting and compiling viruses native to bats in southern China, and unsafely exposed the materials to other animals or viruses that enabled the organism to evolve for purposes of human infection.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending