Jumping up to 18 total times, Congressional Democrats have blocked a vote on making infanticide illegal – again.
Representative Mike Johnson from Louisiana requested a vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivor Protection Act that was not recognized for a vote by the ruling chair. After having his mic muted, Rep. Johnson’s proposed bill was said to not be recognized for debate.
“If the Democrats continue to block consideration of H.R. 962, after 30 legislative days, Republican Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) and Rep. Wagner plan to file a motion to discharge the resolution from the Rules Committee,” according to Life News.
This now makes attempt number 18 that Congressional Republican have proposed a bill that would make it mandatory to give medical attention to infants after being born – 16 times in the House and twice in the Senate.
Sounds sensible, right? Not to the Democrats.
Democrats don’t want this bill to pass because it deals with giving medical attention to babies after failed abortions. But, all the blame doesn’t need to be placed solely on the Dem’s, actually.
Big League Politics previously reported on the proposed bill:
Shouldn’t the so-called “pro-life” Republican-held chamber be the ones pushing these types of bills? One would think. It’s much easier for establishment Republicans to place the blame at the feet of Congressional Democrats instead of taking the blame for not putting their pro-life campaign platform into action.
There is plenty of outrage towards Congressional Dem’s for blocking a vote on this bill that would give medical attention to infants after being born – which is rightfully deserved – but there should be more outrage against Republicans for not being pro-life in action. Establishment Republicans are campaigning on being pro-life to get them elected yet once they earn their seat, all promises of pro-life action goes out the window.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Degenerates Cry about Tennessee Law Preventing Christian Adoption Agencies From Giving Kids to LGBT Predators
Tennessee’s recent ban on forcing Christian adoption agencies to hand over children to gay couples has LGBT activists up in arms that there will be fewer precocious kids for them to get their hands on.
NBC News profiled one LGBT family in Tennessee that shows the immoral and unsettling nature of the social movement.
“I actually identify as bisexual, my wife identifies as lesbian, one dad is transgender and the other is a gay man,” said 38-year-old Amber Stanton explained to the fake news agency, bragging about her 2-year-old adopted daughter Regan, who was surrendered to them by a pregnant transgender “man.”
“She has the whole gamut to her family, and we love it; she has a very special story,” she added.
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed a measure that prevented Christian adoption agencies from losing state funds if they disallowed children from being indicted into these Gomorrah-esque family situations. The state’s LGBT community is worried that they will lose access to the children they crave.
“Adoption comes with so many trials and so many traumas, and of course there’s also so much joy,” Stanton said. “Any parent who goes through the adoption process goes through so much to get to that end adoption day that they are waiting for, and to see that that might be met with discouragement for those who identify as LGBT is very sad.”
The far-left American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is arguing that it is a constitutional right to coerce Christians into funneling children to sodomites.
“The state itself couldn’t say, ‘We’re only going to accept Christians,’ ‘We’re only going to accept Jews,’ or ‘Only people who go to church …’ That’s clear, I think, to pretty much everyone,” said Leslie Cooper, deputy project director of the ACLU’s LGBT & HIV Project.
“When they contract out those services to private organizations, they can’t do that either; it’s still a violation of the Constitution,” she added.
Ever since being legitimized by the Supreme Court, LGBT couples have been aggressively targeting children for adoption. Over 21 percent of LGBT couples, including those in so-called marriages, have adopted kids. They are also more likely to adopt “older, special-needs and minority children,” according to some studies. While advocates for the LGBT agenda use this as an example of the kind and compassionate nature of their community, there may be darker motives afoot.
The case of Mark Newton and Peter Truong show how LGBT predators can use the children they adopt to fuel their twisted and depraved lifestyles:
A gay couple who ran an international paedophile ring involving a son they illegally bought from Russia reportedly planned to buy a second child to exploit.
Mark Newton, 46, and Peter Truong, 40, from Cairns, on Queensland’s coast, sexually abused their adopted Russian son and trafficked him to other paedophiles around the world from the age of one until six…
Newton is serving 40 years in a US prison and Truong is serving 30 in a US prison after they were arrested in 2012 for sexually abusing their son and trafficking him for sex in an international paedophile ring.
Judge Sarah Evans Barker said she didn’t want to put the trial by a jury because she felt the evidence was too heinous for people to witness.
Truong was given a reduced sentence because he cooperated with the authorities.
The pair were found guilty of offering the boy for sex to at least eight men in the US, France and Germany.
Newton and Truong were living in California when the boy, then six, was taken away from them and they were arrested.
When Newton was sentenced in the US, police told the court the boy was adopted in 2005 for the sole purpose of sexual gratification and sex trafficking.
Police also told the court the two men uploaded disturbing images and videos of the abuse to international paedophilia ring ‘Boy Lovers Network’.
They reportedly urged paedophiles to travel to Russia where they could pay to rape the young boy.
Tennessee took preventative measures to prevent heinous situations like this from occurring, but more action will need to be taken to fully stop this predatory agenda.
Trending on BLP
Violent Left3 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
News4 days ago
Virginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
News3 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
Tech4 days ago
More Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
Culture3 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
The Swamp3 days ago
SWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
Deep State4 days ago
Bill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
News4 days ago
GUILTY: Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Convicted in Extortion Trial
Politics4 days ago
MIT Warns That Voting App Used in Several States is Vulnerable for Hackers to ‘Alter, Stop or Expose’ Votes
Politics2 days ago
More Americans Now Identify as Republicans Than They Do As Democrats
News3 days ago
North Dakota Group Wants to Recall County Commissioner for Trying to Flood the County with Third World Refugees
Fake News Media2 days ago
CNN Host Admits He Was “Snookered” By Avenatti After Felony Extortion Conviction