Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Uncategorized

Walmart Backs Down After #BoycottWalmart Campaign

Published

on

What was Walmart thinking? The hashtag #BoycottWalmart was trending earlier on Twitter, racking up more than 50,000 tweets by mid-afternoon. The trending topic was in response to T-shirts and even baby clothing with designs that read “Impeach 45” on the front. As of Tuesday, the T-shirts were all still available for purchase online priced between $16.95 and $41.95 for long-sleeved shirts and hoodies, but no longer listed on their website

Although these Anti-Trump shirts are still available, Walmart has promised to pull the shirts made by Old Glory, a Connecticut-based company but a quick search on Walmart.com showed other versions were also being sold by Hanes Brands Inc. and City Shirts.

The famous retailer also sells Trump slogan apparel with slogans like, “Donald Trump Speaks For Me” and “Make America Great Again”. A quick search on the Walmart website shows Trump’s now famous line “Make America Great Again” and the slogan “America First” available in T-shirts, hoodies, baseball caps, and evern underwear.

This is not the first time that Walmart has come under fire for selling items that did not sit well with consumers. Back in November 2017, the company sold a shirt that read “Rope. Tree. Journalist. SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIRED” before pulling them from racks and their online store.

Trending: EXPOSED: Peter Strzok Grew Up In Iran, Worked As Obama and Brennan’s Envoy To Iranian Regime

As an equal-opportunity offender, back in 2016, Walmart also stopped selling any merchandise with the caption “Bulletproof-Black Lives Matter” after attacks came from the National Fraternal Order of Police, a police advocacy group who wanted to see them pulled from racks immediately.
These items were sold by third-party sellers on our open marketplace and were not offered directly by Walmart,” a spokesman for the retail company said. “We’re removing these types of items pending review of our marketplace policies”

Eric Schiffer, chairman of Reputation Management Consultants said that it was a risky move for Walmart to sell the “Impeach 45” apparel. “Walmart lit the torch of war with the base of Donald Trump,” Schiffer said. “To attack the president is the kiss of death.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Border Security

San Francisco Board of Elections to Allow Non-Citizens to Vote

Published

on

After two failed votes, the San Francisco Board of Elections has finally attained its goal of allowing illegal immigrants to vote in local elections.

“Monday the Department of Elections Issued Voter Registration Forms for non-citizens who are eligible to vote for members of the San Francisco Board of Education in the November 6th 2018 election,” says an ABC San Francisco report. “The measure passed in 2016 with a close vote of 54 percent to 46 percent following two failed previous attempts.”

San Francisco will be the first city in California to allow illegals to vote.

“We want to give immigrants the right to vote,” said Supervisor Norman Yee who represents District 7.

Immigrants already have the right to vote – legal ones, that is. But the political left continues to make a mockery of the American immigration system, spitting in the faces of everyone who comes to this country legally.

“As a parent myself and a former member of the SF Board of Education it is critical that the voices of all parents are at the table particularly those that have historically been denied a voice in the process,” said Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer who represents District 1.

Some sane people disagreed with the vote.

Harmeet Dhillon, Republican National Committeewoman from California voted against the measure in 2016, and spoke out against the latest vote.

“The reason I voted against it is that I think the right to vote is something that goes along with citizenship and should be,” Dhillon said. “I don’t think that people who have otherwise tenuous ties to San Francisco given their lack of legal residence should be making long term decisions about that structure and process.”

Now, the only requirement to vote in the San Francisco Board of Education election is being a resident of the city who is 18 years of age at the time of the election.

The measure allows illegals to vote through 2022, unless the city permanently adopts the ordinance.

 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend