Connect with us

Top Story

EXCLUSIVE: Toronto Police Conceal Jihadist Threat Before Danforth Massacre

Read the official memo warning of a threat

Published

on

On at least one occasion, twelve days before 29-year-old Faisal Hussain killed two innocent girls and imprinted 14 others with a lifelong appreciation of true Islam, Toronto police braced for an impending terror attack, but instead of issuing credible warnings, chose to leave the public in the dark about the severity of the ongoing threat.

On Wednesday, July 11th the Toronto Police Service received what they classified as “credible information” regarding a “potential vehicle ramming attack” set to occur the next day in the area of the CN Tower, an iconic communications and observation tower located in Downtown Toronto.

According to an official police memo obtained and published by the Toronto Sun, Toronto Police treated the incident as a top-level emergency, and placed an “Enhanced Security Plan” in place, essentially launching a military-style anti-terror operation in the heart of Canada’s most populated city.

Trending: President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Further showing both the magnitude of the operation and the severity city officials believed the threat posed, a Major Incident Command Center (MICC) was established to oversea the deployment of “Specialized Support Units”, which included units trained in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosives (CBRNE), and the deployment of an extensive ring of “heavy vehicles” to protect the areas surrounding the tower.

In a copy of the City of Toronto’s official 2013 Emergency Plan, MICC’s are described as a “central point of command, control, and communication” during a major disaster, and assume responsibility, when deployed, for continuity of all policing services throughout the entire city, leaving no doubt of the seriousness of this operation.

The memo also specifically noted that police officers were to operate with a “heightened vigilance” in order to identify suspicious and extremist activity, recommending that officers review the police departments procedures for “counter terrorism” procedures.

“Critical infrastructure, transportation hubs, and areas of large public gatherings remain as targets for lone-actors and/or terrorist/extremist groups, and their sympathizers who wish to stage high-profile attacks,” the memo stated.

To their credit, Toronto Police did make the public aware, through a series of tweets on July 12th, the day the vehicular jihad was expected, that there would be an “increased number of police officers throughout the city and, specifically, in the downtown core.” But these warnings made no indication that the threat was related to terrorism, leaving the public blind to the real threat posed to the city and its residents.

Ultimately no attack transpired, and the Toronto Police made no formal declaration of the threat, but 12 days later a “mentally ill” Muslim jihadist rained metallic judgement down on unsuspecting Christian residents in the predominantly Greek, Danforth district of Toronto.

Was the “credible threat” threat related to the now deceased Danforth shooter Faisal Hussain and his ISIS-inspired aspirations? We may never know, especially since Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, emboldened by his totalitarian unibrow and fresh Bollywood dance moves, has silenced any real domestic investigation into Muslim terror attacks, through the flexing of his nations draconian anti-Islamophobia laws which classifies any criticism of Islam as a speech crime.

It seems an unintended benefit of this legislation has been the achievement of collective amnesia among what remained of Canada’s alleged legal scholars, who all must have ritualistically burned their copies of Section 83.01 of the Criminal Code, which states that any act carried out for political, ideological or religious reasons is terrorism.

In reality, the Danforth genocide, and the paralyzed, incapability of Toronto’s men in blue to deter this jihad, highlights a deeper problem, that being the thorough Islamification of Canada through the nations multi-decade pursuit of open borders and globalization.

Evidence of this can be found in the words of Canada’s top Muslim Cleric, Iqbal Al-Nadvi, who chairs the Canadian Council of Imams, is President of the Canadian branch of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and serves as the chief Muslim chaplain for the Canadian army, who loves to publicly proclaim that “Jihad will continue till the Day of Judgment.”

And for those who claim there are peaceful forms of Jihad, Al-Nadvi’s beloved ICNA publicly clarifies on its website, as pointed out by the Gatestone Institute in 2017, that “the objective of Jihad warrants that one must struggle against Kufr (disbelief) and Shirk (polytheism) and the worship of falsehood in all its forms. Jihad has to continue until this objective is achieved.”

Damning words, from a damned people, but alas, pointing these truths out will not revive 10-year old Julianna Kozis and 18-year-old Reese Fallon, who was ironically a volunteer for Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party of Canada.

https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1022879315359232005

Canada now must now face its reality after pursuing suicidal societal transformation.

Does the nation that once dutifully stood with the West to defeat Adolf Hitler have one last fight left inside of them? Retake Canada now, before the next Muslim kills.

Top Story

Daughter of Man Involved in Fatal 1972 Biden Car Crash Accuses Joe Biden of Falsely Accusing Dad of Driving Drunk

She says he wasn’t a drunk driver. And he was never charged.

Published

on

The daughter of a man who was involved in a 1972 car crash that resulted in the deaths of Joe Biden’s then-wife, Neilia, and the couple’s one-year old daughter, Naomi, is accusing Joe Biden of falsely blaming her father for the tragic incident.

Deborah Criddle, the daughter of Curtis Dunn, is calling on Joe Biden to “set the record straight” on several claims he’s made in previous years, in which Biden suggested Curtis Dunn was intoxicated or an alcoholic when speaking about the crash. Dunn was never charged or convicted of any traffic or DUI violations stemming from the incident.

Criddle brought up Biden’s accusations towards Dunn in remarks provided to The Sun newspaper on Wednesday.

Criddle says that she became motivated to speak out on Biden’s claims after he repeatedly called Donald Trump a liar during the first presidential debate. She calls such a description as the “pot calling the kettle black,” and that “Biden has got a lot of nerve calling Trump a liar.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

(Deborah Criddle)

Criddle has spoken out before, in 2008, when Biden made the latest of several inferences suggesting Curtis Dunn was drunk during the crash.

A tractor-trailer, a guy who allegedly – and I never pursued it – drank his lunch instead of eating his lunch, broadsided my family and killed my wife instantly and killed my daughter instantly and hospitalized my two sons,” Biden had claimed in 2007. He previously suggested that alcohol was involved in the crash in 2001.

A Delaware Superior Court Judge, Jerome O. Herlihy- who investigated the crash at the time as a prosecutor- clarified that there was no reason to believe that any intoxication was involved in the incident when asked about the situation in 2008.

The rumor about alcohol being involved by either party, especially the truck driver (Dunn), is incorrect,” said the judge in response to Joe Biden’s continued suggestions that Dunn was intoxicated at the time of the crash.

Police investigating the incident ultimately determined that the crash was determined by a t-bone accident in which the vehicle Neilia Biden was driving pulled into the right of way and was struck by a tractor Curtis Dunn was driving.

Criddle is describing Dunn, who died in 1999, as a loving father and family man.

The 1972 car crash was a tragedy for everyone involved, including then-Senator-elect Joe Biden, regardless of the exact circumstances. A one-year old baby and a mother of three children lost their lives. Falsely accusing a party involved of culpability- no matter how slight- without substantiation is a serious matter, one that Biden should answer to regardless of the passage of time since the incident.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending