Connect with us

News

Wisconsin Police Visit Mom Because She Allowed Her Child to Play at Friend’s House

Published

on

A video surfaced yesterday showing Wiscosin police officers visiting the home of a parent who allowed her child to play at their friends house during stay-at-home orders.

The video starts as the mom answers the door and is greeted by two police officers, one male and one female.

The male officer says, “Hi, Amy…. Are you aware that we are in a stay-at-home order, right now?”

Trending: WATCH: Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles Recounts Election Improprieties in Georgia Recount

Amy replied, “Uh, yeah, obviously…. Yes. I am aware.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

From the tone of both the officers and the mom, it is clear the police had some sort of interaction with her recently about the matter.

To conversation continues:

Male Officer:  So, I don’t need to explain that to you?

Amy:  No. You don’t need to explain that to me.

Male Officer:  Okay. Because I can, if you need me to.

Amy:  You can, because you’re officer was here two weeks ago, and he explained to me that you guys weren’t enforcing that order.

Male Officer:  Oh. We’re about to. You understand it, though?

Amy:  Okay. So, why are you here?

Male Officer:  Besause you’re daughter is going to play at other people’s home, and you’re allowing it to happen.

Amy:  They were over here, as well. So…

Male Officer:  And they’ve been talked to. So, either you can acknowledge it or argue with it.

Amy:  Okay. I acknowledge it….

After this back and forth, there was some bickering between the female officer and Amy concerning whether Amy was required to give her middle initial and last name.

The interaction ended with the female officer informing Amy that it would be documented that she understood why they were there and that she was being uncooperative.

This interaction could be better understood if we had additional context. But there are some things that seem reasonable to conclude.

Amy had an interaction with an officer after days before, in which she was told they would not be enforcing the stay-at-home order.

Upon hearing this, Amy made a judgment call.  She decided it was reasonable to continue to allow her child to play with their friends.

She probably sees that as a reasonable decision because the chances of her child contracting, spreading, and killing someone, simply due to his play-date with a neighbor kid, is obviously extremely low.

Then, someone at the department either decided on their own or through the encouragement of an upper (or maybe even an annoying busy-body Karen type), that they were going to, at least, try to pursuade the mom into compliance.

They decided to do so via an additional house visit, which could reasonably be interpreted as harassment or a threat of enforcement.

If these conclusions are true, then this is another example of tyrannical governments and police departments pushing for unnecessary and unethical control over citizens lives.

Because these types of over the top orders and enforcement of said orders is obviously not for safety.

These orders are about daddy government and its enforcers taking away rights and seizing control over our lives, despite their proper role being the protection of individual rights.

Big League Guns

Black Rifle Coffee Does Not Support Second Amendment Hero Kyle Rittenhouse

At this Time, Cons

Published

on

Black Rifle Coffee, a coffee company based in Salt Lake City, is not defending 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse.

The company said that it was against a tweet that Blaze Media reporter, Elijah Schaeffer,  posted that featured Rittenhouse wearing a Black Rifle Coffee Company shirt captioned “Kyle Rittenhouse drinks the best coffee in America.” Rittenhouse was released on November 20, 2020 after supporters were able to raise $2 million for his bail. 

In the tweet, Schaeffer posted a discount code for the coffee. Sara Tabin of The Salt Lake Tribune noted that online Twitter users “questioned whether the coffee company had a sponsorship deal with Rittenhouse and accused it of supporting murder and hate.”

This prompted Black Rifle Coffee, the sponsor of the Slightly Offens*ve podcast, to release a statement on November 21 declaring that it is not sponsoring or supporting Rittenhouse.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Initially, there was a misunderstanding about the company withdrawing its sponsorship of Slightly Offens*ve. However, a spokesperson for the company told the Salt Lake Tribune on November 21 that “We are not fluctuating our ad spend.” The coffee spokesperson added “We did have a conversation with Schaffer, and he understands that the post was a mistake.”

She stressed, “We don’t traffic in national tragedy and to us, that’s what this is. We are not legal experts or members of law enforcement. We fully support all law enforcement officials and believe in the integrity of the legal system.”

The spokesperson reiterated that the company will maintain its sponsorship of Blaze Media. She explained: “Our concern is that use of the discount code in the post did not reflect our values. That’s a concern we’ve addressed with the journalist and that he understands.”

Blaze employees “make decisions about how to allocate ad dollars within the Blaze,” she remarked. Although the spokesperson did not go into further detail about the company’s status as a podcast sponsor, it noted that the coffee company and the Blaze are in talks about “how to move forward with the allocation of ad dollars.”

Black Rifle Coffee positions itself as a pro-Second Amendment, conservative company that was founded by veterans. Black Rifle Coffee co-founder Evan Hafer released a statement on November 21 declaring that “We do not support legal advocacy efforts. We do not sponsor nor do we have a relationship with the 17-year-old facing charges in Kenosha, WI.”

At the moment, Rittenhouse is facing two counts of first-degree murder for shooting and killing Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber during a Black Lives Matter riot back in August. In addition, he’s being charged with one count of being a minor in possession of a firearm. During the riots, Rittenhouse was attacked by Rosenbaum. Rittenhouse was carrying an AR-style rifle as he was walking down the street to protect private property from looters.

It is disappointing to see supposedly pro-Second Amendment businesses fold to the mob. Although the Left is very effective at mass politics and causing certain businesses to get cancelled, some businesses will have to take a stand. Submission to these radicals only encourages them to become bolder in their attacks. 

Can Americans actually grow a spine for once?

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending