Connect with us

News

Wisconsin Police Visit Mom Because She Allowed Her Child to Play at Friend’s House

Published

on

A video surfaced yesterday showing Wiscosin police officers visiting the home of a parent who allowed her child to play at their friends house during stay-at-home orders.

The video starts as the mom answers the door and is greeted by two police officers, one male and one female.

The male officer says, “Hi, Amy…. Are you aware that we are in a stay-at-home order, right now?”

Trending: REJECTED: Marjorie Taylor Greene Stops Cori Bush’s Amendment to Allow Violent Convicted Felons to Vote

Amy replied, “Uh, yeah, obviously…. Yes. I am aware.”

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

From the tone of both the officers and the mom, it is clear the police had some sort of interaction with her recently about the matter.

To conversation continues:

Male Officer:  So, I don’t need to explain that to you?

Amy:  No. You don’t need to explain that to me.

Male Officer:  Okay. Because I can, if you need me to.

Amy:  You can, because you’re officer was here two weeks ago, and he explained to me that you guys weren’t enforcing that order.

Male Officer:  Oh. We’re about to. You understand it, though?

Amy:  Okay. So, why are you here?

Male Officer:  Besause you’re daughter is going to play at other people’s home, and you’re allowing it to happen.

Amy:  They were over here, as well. So…

Male Officer:  And they’ve been talked to. So, either you can acknowledge it or argue with it.

Amy:  Okay. I acknowledge it….

After this back and forth, there was some bickering between the female officer and Amy concerning whether Amy was required to give her middle initial and last name.

The interaction ended with the female officer informing Amy that it would be documented that she understood why they were there and that she was being uncooperative.

This interaction could be better understood if we had additional context. But there are some things that seem reasonable to conclude.

Amy had an interaction with an officer after days before, in which she was told they would not be enforcing the stay-at-home order.

Upon hearing this, Amy made a judgment call.  She decided it was reasonable to continue to allow her child to play with their friends.

She probably sees that as a reasonable decision because the chances of her child contracting, spreading, and killing someone, simply due to his play-date with a neighbor kid, is obviously extremely low.

Then, someone at the department either decided on their own or through the encouragement of an upper (or maybe even an annoying busy-body Karen type), that they were going to, at least, try to pursuade the mom into compliance.

They decided to do so via an additional house visit, which could reasonably be interpreted as harassment or a threat of enforcement.

If these conclusions are true, then this is another example of tyrannical governments and police departments pushing for unnecessary and unethical control over citizens lives.

Because these types of over the top orders and enforcement of said orders is obviously not for safety.

These orders are about daddy government and its enforcers taking away rights and seizing control over our lives, despite their proper role being the protection of individual rights.

Big League Guns

Democrats Introduce Expanded Background Check Legislation

Democrats are going to implement a background check which targets “extremism.”

Published

on

Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy and California Congressman Mike Thompson brought forward legislation on March 2, 2021 that aims to broaden the federal background check system on firearms sales, according to a report by The Hill.

Under The Background Check Expansion Act,  gun sales and purchases between all unlicensed sellers and buyers would be subject to a mandatory background check. The background checks would not be applicable for law enforcement officers, lending out firearms for the purpose of hunting, temporary transfers for self-defense, or family members gifting a firearm. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and 43 Senate Democrats have co-sponsored this bill. Thompson, who is the chair of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, reintroduced this legislation in the U.S. House

“For years, the bipartisan House-passed background checks bill languished in the Senate under Republican Leader Mitch McConnell. Now, with Senate Democrats in the Majority, we have the opportunity to act on this overwhelmingly popular, lifesaving legislation to protect American communities,” Schumer declared in a press release.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

According to a CBS News report, President Joe Biden has repeatedly called on Congress to pass stiffer gun control laws. This gun control bill will not pass so easily given how it will need 10 Republican senators to vote in favor of it.

Against the backdrop of the January 6 storming of the Capitol, such a background check will likely feature provisions that target so-called “extremists.” The ruling class has routinely lumped average gun owners with domestic extremists and will most certainly use recent events to justify encroachments on people’s right to bear arms. 

Biden is a veteran of the gun control movement, as evidenced by his sponsorship of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban. With Democrats in control of all branches of the federal government, they will certainly move to pass gun control. However, their success is not guaranteed due to moderate Democrats like Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema and West Virginia Joe Manchin not being completely receptive to radical gun control that could alienate them from their more right-wing constituents.

Nevertheless, the Left has shown that it’s willing to act regardless of the political context. Keeping this in mind, gun owners must be ready to beat back any kind of gun control coming from D.C. Such fights will allow the Right to rebuild its forces and make a splash in the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential race. 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending