As the mainstream media attempts to give researcher Katie Bouman credit for the first “photos” of a black hole, it appears her role may have been mostly supervisory, and that other researchers did the majority of the leg work.
According to data provided publicly by GitHub, Bouman made 2,410 contributions to the over 900,000 lines of code required to create the first-of-its-kind black hole image, or 0.26 per cent. Bouman’s contributions also occurred toward the end of the work on the code.
In contrast, contributor Andrew Chael wrote over 850,000 lines of code.
While CNN attempted to give Bouman full credit, explaining “That’s where Bouman’s algorithm — along with several others — came in,” they slyly admitted that fellow researchers told CNN “‘(Bouman) was a major part of one of the imaging subteams,'” even after CNN incorrectly wrote on the previous line that she was on one of the “imaging teams,” not subteams.
BBC News was even more zealous in its eagerness to have a woman at the helm, and titled its article “Katie Bouman: The woman behind the first black hole image”.
Phys.org went even further, calling the young scientist a “superstar” in its headline.
While the Western media attempted to use her gender to make a point, Asian publications, including Asahi, offered a more nuanced and truthful article, writing that “207 scientists in 17 nations and regions took part in the project,” and refusing to assign the achievement to any one of the scientists.
For her part, Bouman made it clear on Facebook that she did not want sole credit for the achievement.
“No one algorithm or person made this image,” wrote Bouman, “it required the amazing talent of a team of scientists from around the globe and years of hard work” to capture the black hole image.
Replying to one of the comment asking if the image was made by her personally, Bouman added “Actually no, there were a number of us that all squeezed into the room and pressed go on our computers at the same exact time! We didn’t want any one person or algorithm to be the first one to make the image.”
She also gave “shout outs” to Chael and many of the other scientists she worked with.
I'm so excited that we finally get to share what we have been working on for the past year! The image shown today is the…
It appears the American mainstream media lost sight of the truth in an attempt to give a female scientist undue credit for a massive achievement that should have the entire scientific community involved with the photo patting itself on the back collectively.
National Review Spits on Whistleblowers Attesting to Massive Vote Fraud, Endorses Election Rigging
The editors at the National Review have released an op/ed that essentially endorses widespread Democrat vote rigging and denigrates the efforts of whistleblowers who have attested via sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury to witnessing fraud on election day.
“The chief driver of the post-election contention of the past several weeks is the petulant refusal of one man to accept the verdict of the American people,” the editors wrote.
The editors paid lip service to concerns “about the security of mail-in ballots and the process of counting votes” but only to sweep the massive evidence of fraud under the rug. They claim that Trump has circulated “already-debunked claims and crackpot conspiracy theories about Dominion voting systems,” without doing much of anything to address many credible claims about the vote hacking software.
National Review proclaims the honor and the integrity of Republican officials who are refusing to investigate the electoral abnormalities or use their constitutionally-delegated powers to overturn the steal.
“Trump’s most reprehensible tactic has been to attempt, somewhat shamefacedly, to get local Republican officials to block the certification of votes and state legislatures to appoint Trump electors in clear violation of the public will,” the editors wrote.
“This has gone nowhere, thanks to the honesty and sense of duty of most of the Republicans involved, but it’s a profoundly undemocratic move that we hope no losing presidential candidate ever even thinks of again,” they added.
It is worth noting that the op/ed by National Review did not mention the hundreds of sworn affidavits attesting to fraud one single time. The article makes it clear that these editors are a party to the color revolution coup that is underway against the president.
Big League Politics has covered the whistleblowers who have come forward amidst tremendous institutional pressure to tell the story of how the vote was stolen on election night:
Poll worker Mellissa Carone is going public after signing an affidavit that detailed extensive abnormalities happening at the absentee ballot counting board in the TCF Center in Detroit on election night.
Carone wrote in her affidavit about how ballots were scanned and counted multiple times at the facility. She has also attested that Republicans were deliberately disenfranchised throughout the process and robbed of their rights so they could not snuff out any potential fraud.
“I witnessed countless workers rescanning the batches without discarding them first which resulted in ballots being counted 4-5 times,” Carone wrote in her affidavit.
She appeared on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on Wednesday. Dobbs described an IT specialist who was “contracted by Dominion voting services to offer technical support while votes were being counted in Detroit.” Her attorney, David Kallman also appeared on the broadcast alongside her. She explained how mysterious food vans showed up bringing up cargo that did not appear to be food.
“I worked a 24 hour shift… I was there during their day shift and their night shift. The city provides the workers with food for their shift. Well, they only had enough food for one-third of their workers. So, that is the reason why they were claiming that these vans were brought in, but these vans did not have food in them,” Carone said.
“I was not allowed over in that area at all, but the van was definitely not big enough to be carrying food for two-thirds of those workers,” she added.
Kallman explained how he is proceeding with lawsuits to create an audit for the elections to ensure full transparency.
“Michigan now has a new constitutional provision that allows voters to request a results-oriented audit to ensure the accuracy and integrity of elections, so we are asking the court, and we did it today…The judge is going to rule at noon on Friday as to whether or not an injunction will issue to stop the certification of the vote and whether or not there or not will be an audit order as well as a protective order to protect evidence so it is not destroyed,” Kallman said.
The editors at National Review have picked a side and will have to live with the consequences of their behavior if the dubious election is overturned and those guilty of treason are punished appropriately.
Big League Wellness3 days ago
New Study Shows 84 Percent Decrease in Hospitalization Rates for COVID-19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine
Congress3 days ago
‘Let Them Be Free!’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Urges Trump to Pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange for Exposing ‘the Crimes of Barack Obama and the Deep State’
States3 days ago
Illicit $25 Million Dominion Deal Set Up in Michigan by Former Democrat ‘Voter Protection’ Czar is Listed as Evidence in Kraken Lawsuit
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Los Angeles Enacts Full Coronavirus Lockdown for Three Weeks
Politics3 days ago
MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: James Mattis Bashes ‘America First’ as He Takes $$$ From Pro-China Lobbyists
Campaign 20203 days ago
Nevada Whistleblower Exposes Astronomical Spike of Voter Registrations with Invalid Data in Swing County Prior to Election
States3 days ago
Michigan Election Day Whistleblowers Demand for Republicans to Convene Voter Fraud Hearings
Free Speech3 days ago
YOUR NEW MASTER: Twitter’s Head of Conversational Safety, a “Young, Queer Asian-American Businesswoman,” is “Rethinking” the Concept of User Safety