Connect with us

News

AL.com Peddles Falsehood that Moore Camp Levied Salacious Claims at Corfman

Leigh Corfman’s own attorney, with whom she slept, calls into question her credibility, claiming she was very promiscuous in her teens.

Published

on

Lawyers from the Corfman camp accusing former Judge Roy Moore of “defamation” are themselves guilty of publicizing salacious information about Corfman, according to new information obtained by Big League Politics.

Paul Gattis, who covers Roy Moore for AL.com made the false claim in his March 11  article”Leigh Corfman fires back at Roy Moore’s ‘personal attacks.

Gattis gives readers the impression that Moore is unilaterally making specious and salacious claims about Corfman — but either intentionally or sloppily, leaves out the fact that it was Corfman’s attorneys and her former attorney and lifelong friend Eddie Sexton, who confirmed the testimony of Sexton associate Gary Lantrip in which Lantrip recounted Sexton’s own denigration of Corfman

Sexton himself even confirmed Lantrip’s testimony in his own deposition — a deposition Corfman’s attorneys entered into the record.

If Gattis’s story is the only thing people read, they’d walk away unaware that Corfman’s attorneys — not Moore — are actually attacking Corfman, and then have the temerity to play the victim by running to a compliant press at AL.com to carry their water for them.

Trending: Stanford University Babies Demand “Removal” of College Republicans from Campus

It’s worth repeating: There are at least two depositions of other individuals corroborating the information Corfman’s own attorneys released discrediting Corfman and throwing doubt onto her claims. Yet Paul Gattis only focused on one deposition of a Moore supporter.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Gary Lantrip is a personal friend of Corfman’s attorney, Eddie Sexton — whose colorful comments were affirmed and averred by the same individual in sworn testimony before the court. Lantrip swore to the truth of Sexton’s comments.

Later, in Sexton’s own deposition, the former Corfman attorney confirmed Sexton’s description of Corfman’s sexually promiscuous lifestyle and her having been thrown into sex parties.

Notably, none of the facts presented by Lantrip and Sexton, her lifelong friend and attorney, respectively — ever enter the public discourse if Corfman doesn’t bring this lawsuit against Judge Moore.

Notably, this is a lawsuit filed by Leigh Corfman. It is a lawsuit that has been called frivolous.

Therefore, the lawsuit which resulted in Sexton’s testimony about Corfman — his former client  and lover — and Gary Lantrip’s testimony, is the source of Ms. Corfman’s ill repute, not Judge Moore, and not Breitbart.

Despite all these facts, the legacy media outlets like the Washington Post and AL.com persist in carrying water for Corfman and her attorneys by blatantly ignoring public court documents readily available to anyone willing to do a bit of research.

The legacy media in Alabama, led by Paul Gattis, and in D.C., led by the Washington Post, are intently pursuing the uncorroborated claim that someone offered Sexton to denigrate his former client Leigh Corfman.

Each of these news outlets failed to report that Sexton denigrated Corfman without being paid any funds, and he did so under oath. Gary Lantrip confirmed Sexton’s doubts about Corfman’s credibility, and he also did so without having been paid anything, also under oath.

As of today, no one has paid anyone any amount of money for anyone to denigrate Leigh Corfman.

Her own attorney is doing it all on his own. And the legacy media covering the court proceedings continues to ignore these facts.

Big League Politics decided to look into how a supposedly seasoned reporter like Paul Gattis could fail to perform even the most basic fact check on the claim he reported on 11 March. 

Was Gattis aware of the testimonies given by Sexton about his former client and sex partner? Where did Mr. Gattis acquire the facts for his story? Did Mr. Gattis ever review the court depositions personally?

These and other pertinent questions were submitted to the AL.com reporter yesterday and as of 5 p.m. CST. Sadly, Mr. Gattis was unavailable for comment.

Here’s a run-down of the testimony Mr. Gattis chose to ignore:

According to testimony taken under oath of Corfman’s former attorney and lifelong friend Eddie Sexton, and of Sexton’s client, Gary Lantrip, Corfman’s behavior is far from consistent with the “good girl” image she consistently projects.

Lantrip remarked:

When Eddie [Sexton] said he was going to drop her, he said she’s (F’d expletive) everybody in Gadsden, including

himself, and that her dad was a doctor and they used to throw sex parties when she was young so she was put in with that as a young girl, and he’s known her her whole life. (Lantrip deposition, p. 110)

When Sexton was asked under oath if he had, in fact, made the above statement, he answered:

I don’t know if that is exactly what I said. I probably did. I mean, I probably did tell him that I had sex with her. (Sexton deposition, p. 113)

When asked about sex parties being thrown when Corfman was young, Sexton stated:

I don’t know — I don’t know about young. I said that I had heard that, too. I mean, I probably did tell him that. (Sexton deposition, p. 118)

Sexton was subsequently asked, who he had heard that from, and he replied;

I don’t know. Probably people at the Country Club, kinda sorta. Like it would have been kids. I don’t know nothing. I doubt that it would have been somebody that would have claimed to be there.” (Sexton deposition p 119)

Finally, when asked if he thought any of his comments, as related by Lantrip, were “disparaging” of Leigh Corfman, Sexton replied:

“I think they could be, yeah.” (Sexton Deposition, pp. 119-20)

As one can read in the publicly available court documents, the person disparaging Leigh Corfman is her former attorney who has “known her her whole life.”

 

Big League Guns

Merrick Garland Suggests that Getting Rid of Lawsuit Protections is Not a Second Amendment Violation

Garland as AG will be a disaster for the right to bear arms.

Published

on

If Merrick Garland is nominated as Attorney General, the Second Amendment is in big trouble.

Based on his comments at a Senate hearing on February 22, 2021, Garland made a suggestion that the repeal of lawsuit protections for gun manufacturers is not unconstitutional. 

AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News reminded his readers that President Joe Biden campaigned on a platform of repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shielded lawful gun manufacturers from lawsuits.

In a previous Breitbart News report, Biden spoke at an MSNBC forum in 2019 alongside gun control organizations such as March for Our Lives where he expressed his support for gun manufacturers to be subject to lawsuits.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

At the speech, Biden suggested that the PLCC be repealed. He declared, “No other outfit in history has gotten this kind of protection” and asserted that the legal actions would bring about “change overnight.”

In a subsequent occasion on February 7, 2020, Breitbart News covered Biden’s remarks to a New Hampshire crowd, in which he stated that it was a “mistake” to shield firearms manufacturers from lawsuits. He continued, “The first thing I’m going to do as president is work to get rid of that.” 

Later that month, Breitbart News recalled how Biden called out gun manufacturers at a South Carolina rally and boasted, “I’m going to take you down.”

According to a report by The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked Garland about his views on removing protections for gun manufacturers. Garland responded, “I have not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t think it raises a Second Amendment issue.”

When he was questioned if he is in favor of Biden’s plans to ban so-called “assault weapons”, Garland responded, “Where there is room under the law for the president’s policies to be pursued, then I think the president is entitled to pursue them.”

Biden’s track record as a gun control proponent is well-documented. From his support of gun-free zones at schools to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, Biden is Gun Control Inc.’s guy. With Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, there will most certainly be attempts to ram gun control down our throats. If they can’t beat us legislatively, they will most certainly use the courts to undermine the Second Amendment. Pro-gun organizations should be ready to lawyer up and use whatever means possible to keep courts from destroying our rights.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending