Will No Compromise Gun Organizations be Next?
The National Rifle Association is facing an unprecedented threat from anti-gun forces.
The Trace reported on some of the NRA’s latest fundraising efforts where Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre “warned that liberal regulators were threatening to destroy the organization.”
LaPierre wrote “We’re facing an attack that’s unprecedented not just in the history of the NRA but in the entire history of our country.”
The NRA Executive Vice President continued “The Second Amendment cannot survive without the NRA, and the NRA cannot survive without your help right now.”
This is in reference to the state of New York’s current campaign to shutdown some of the NRA’s insurance services.
LaPierre’s assertions have validity since the NRA has “run annual deficits of as much as $40 million.” Such financial troubles have seen the NRA become “mainly a media company, promoting a lifestyle built around loving guns and hating anyone who might take them away.”
Particularly interesting is Ackerman McQueen, a public-relations firm out of Oklahoma, and its involvement in cultivating the NRA’s brand. Many NRA figures such as Dana Loesch and Oliver North have received considerable payments from this firm.
However, this relationship has been a double-edged sword according to Mike Spies of The Trace. Spies claims that “a small group of NRA executives, contractors, and vendors has extracted hundreds of millions of dollars from the nonprofit’s budget, through gratuitous payments, sweetheart deals, and opaque financial arrangements.”
According to a memo from a senior NRA employee, the NRA workplace has been “distinguished by secrecy, self-dealing, and greed, whose leaders have encouraged disastrous business ventures and questionable partnerships, and have marginalized those who object.”
In 2017, when the NRA made its tax filings public, the organization has been placed under considerable scrutiny.
Marc Owens, who was the head of the Internal Revenue Service division that oversees tax-exempt enterprises, claims that the “litany of red flags is just extraordinary” after reviewing the NRA’s tax filings. Owens continued, “The materials reflect one of the broadest arrays of likely transgressions that I’ve ever seen. There is a tremendous range of what appears to be the misuse of assets for the benefit of certain vendors and people in control.”
Owens then concluded, “Those facts, if confirmed, could lead to the revocation of the NRA’s tax-exempt status”, effectively putting the organization’s existence in peril.
The NRA’s Carry Guard program has also earned it considerable criticism in recent times. This liability insurance program protects NRA members who use their firearms in self-defense.
Many on the anti-gun Left have derided this program as “murder insurance” and are now targeting it via financial regulations.
The Parkland shooting of 2018 saw numerous states pass draconian forms of gun control, with New York being one of those states.
In the wake of the Parkland shooting, the State Department of Financial Services in New York has specifically targeted Carry Guard and declared that it “could no longer be sold in the state.”
This has prompted the NRA to take the DFS and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to court.
It remains to be seen how this decision will turn out, but the NRA is facing an unprecedented threat from anti-gunners.
Many gun owners on the no compromise side of the aisle have criticized NRA for not taking hardline stances in favor of fully restoring gun rights. BLP reported on NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox defending red flag gun confiscation legislation a year ago.
However, this recent episode of the New York State government trying to punish the NRA shows the lengths the anti-gun Left will take to put the clamps on pro-gun organizations. They are willing to weaponize the U.S.’s flawed tax system as a means of shutting down conservative groups. If the NRA goes down, other organizations such as GOA and NAGR will likely be in their crosshairs.
Starbucks Barista FIRED After Refusing to Wear “Pride” T-Shirt for Religious Reasons, According to Lawsuit
She is a Christian and was apparently told by her manager that she didn’t have to wear it.
A former Starbucks barista is filing an unlawful discrimination lawsuit against the coffee giant, claiming they fired her for refusing to wear a “Pride” t-shirt that violated her Christian religious convictions.
Betsy Fresse started working as a barista in December 2015. After transferring to a Glen Ridge, New Jersey, store in early 2019, managers apparently “assured” her that her Christian faith wouldn’t be an issue.
Then in June 2019, she noticed a box of Pride shirts on a desk and asked if they’d make her wear one. Her store manager said she wouldn’t have to, but two months later she found herself out of a job after being terminated by a district manager.
A notice of separation claims that Fresse was fired for violating Starbucks’ “core values.” It specifically mentions an incident where she said her colleagues “need Jesus” when given the “Pride” shirt.
Starbucks maintains that “no part of our dress code requires partners to wear any approved items that they have not personally selected” and that Fresse’s claims are “without merit,” in a comment to the New York Post.
So Starbucks denies that she was fired for not wearing the shirt, yet their notice of separation appears to claim that they fired her for something she said about Jesus. Not a good look either way.
Fresse is seeking backpay, punitive damages, money to cover the cost of an attorney, and a permanent injunction that prevents Starbucks from “failing to accommodate […] sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Starbucks has long been a major player in the world of Woke Capital. Back in February Big League Politics reported on how the British branch of Starbucks was raising money for a pro-transgender lobbying group:
The U.K. branch of Starbucks is raising money to push for the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children.
Nathanael Blake at The Federalist reported that the multinational titan is selling special mermaid-shaped cookies to help the pro-transgender lobbying group Mermaids. Curiously, the group’s founder took her underage son to Thailand to undergo a castration procedure.
Blake correctly observed “That Starbucks is supporting this group illustrates how thoroughly radicals have conquered both the LGBT movement and corporate culture.”
He also called attention to how “In a few years the fight has shifted from government recognition of same-sex relationships as legal marriages to mastectomies, sterilization, and castration for children.”
Here’s hoping that Betsy Fresse is successful in her lawsuit.
Culture3 days ago
HMM: Michelle Obama was Desperate Not to be Photographed in a Bikini as First Lady
Campaign 20203 days ago
President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators
Congress2 days ago
‘Let Them Be Free!’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Urges Trump to Pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange for Exposing ‘the Crimes of Barack Obama and the Deep State’
Campaign 20204 days ago
California Republicans Flip Third US House Seat from Democrats in 2020
Big League Wellness2 days ago
New Study Shows 84 Percent Decrease in Hospitalization Rates for COVID-19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine
States3 days ago
Illicit $25 Million Dominion Deal Set Up in Michigan by Former Democrat ‘Voter Protection’ Czar is Listed as Evidence in Kraken Lawsuit
Politics3 days ago
MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: James Mattis Bashes ‘America First’ as He Takes $$$ From Pro-China Lobbyists
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Los Angeles Enacts Full Coronavirus Lockdown for Three Weeks