The State Department has confirmed that it has “issued 23 violations and 7 infractions incidents” pertaining to the Hillary Clinton email scandal. Hillary Clinton used a private non-secure email server during her tenure at the State Department, did not notify her own Department that she was using a private server, continued using technology that she was warned had been breached overseas, and deleted more than 30,000 emails before her associates smashed and destroyed her gadgetry.
“Consistent with longstanding policy, the Department does not release the names of current or former employees participating in the security incident program. However, in the spirit of cooperation, the Department can share with you certain information about the status of the ongoing review. To this point, the Department has assessed culpability to 15 individuals, some of whom were culpable in multiple security incidents. DS has issued 23 violations and 7 infractions incidents under 12 FAM 550. This number will likely change as the review progresses,” Assistant Secretary of Bureau of Legislative Affairs Mary Elizabeth Taylor wrote.
Hillary Clinton suffered documented “mailbox corruption” during her tenure as Secretary of State, further highlighting the ease with which foreign enemies gained access to her private email server and also her non-secure Blackberry, which she us
ed despite her own State Department telling her not to.
The latest round of discoveries in the Judicial Watch fight to expose Clinton’s email scandal yields fruit.
A well-entrenched Washington insider sends BLP this dispatch:
“In Judicial Watch’s FOIA release today, there is lots of good information but the most important is this:
“On October 15, 2012, Clinton’s IT technician Bryan Pagliano, sent to Bill Clinton’s aide Justin Cooper a bill indicating that on July 28-29, 2012, Pagliano had to address the issue of “Mailbox Corruption” of Hillary Clinton’s email server, spending a total of 5.5 hours on the problem.“
This is very important because as we discussed previously (email chain below), on June 28th 2012 Hillary Clinton was in Russia and using her email to communicate with President Obama about his victory with Obama Care in the Supreme Court. We know this because Comey admitted to it in his Congressional testimony to Congressman Ratcliffe. So let’s put all of these facts into prospective:
June 28th 2012 – Hillary Clinton uses her personal email in communications with the President of the United States. She emails to him at his secret/private email address. Hillary Clinton does this while in Russia which everyone in foreign intelligence knows conducts electronic gathering and surveillance of US Officials in their country.
July 28-29th 2012 – Clinton’s IT technician Bryan Pagliano conducts 5.5 hours of work on the Clinton server to deal with a “Mailbox Corruption” issue.
June 27th 2016 – The FBI and DOJ were worried about the potential damage of the Hillary Clinton communications to President Obama from her 2012 Russia trip.
June 27th 2016 in the afternoon – AG Loretta Lynch meets with former President Bill Clinton on the tarmac 4 days before Hillary Clinton is to be interviewed by the FBI.
Hillary Clinton was most definitely hacked shortly after her trip to Russia. The hackers not only got access to all her information but they also got a lead in how to hack President Obama’s secret/private email address. When the FBI was worried about this issue during their Midyear Exam investigation, AG Loretta Lynch meets secretly with former President Clinton to discuss!
The well-entrenched Washington insider’s dispatch ends
BLP reported: Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton used her non-secure personal Blackberry while visiting Moscow, Russia as Secretary of State in October 2009, according to photographic evidence.
Clinton’s Blackberry device was already breached on her first official 2009 trip to East Asia, and the State Department explicitly told her not to continue using the Blackberry. But Clinton’s Blackberry has been identified in a photograph of the former Secretary of State in a subsequent trip to Russia.
Clinton’s obvious gross negligence regarding the security of her official communications complicates Robert Mueller’s unsubstantiated “Russia” case against President Donald Trump.
Merrick Garland Suggests that Getting Rid of Lawsuit Protections is Not a Second Amendment Violation
Garland as AG will be a disaster for the right to bear arms.
If Merrick Garland is nominated as Attorney General, the Second Amendment is in big trouble.
Based on his comments at a Senate hearing on February 22, 2021, Garland made a suggestion that the repeal of lawsuit protections for gun manufacturers is not unconstitutional.
AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News reminded his readers that President Joe Biden campaigned on a platform of repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shielded lawful gun manufacturers from lawsuits.
In a previous Breitbart News report, Biden spoke at an MSNBC forum in 2019 alongside gun control organizations such as March for Our Lives where he expressed his support for gun manufacturers to be subject to lawsuits.
At the speech, Biden suggested that the PLCC be repealed. He declared, “No other outfit in history has gotten this kind of protection” and asserted that the legal actions would bring about “change overnight.”
In a subsequent occasion on February 7, 2020, Breitbart News covered Biden’s remarks to a New Hampshire crowd, in which he stated that it was a “mistake” to shield firearms manufacturers from lawsuits. He continued, “The first thing I’m going to do as president is work to get rid of that.”
Later that month, Breitbart News recalled how Biden called out gun manufacturers at a South Carolina rally and boasted, “I’m going to take you down.”
According to a report by The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked Garland about his views on removing protections for gun manufacturers. Garland responded, “I have not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t think it raises a Second Amendment issue.”
When he was questioned if he is in favor of Biden’s plans to ban so-called “assault weapons”, Garland responded, “Where there is room under the law for the president’s policies to be pursued, then I think the president is entitled to pursue them.”
Biden’s track record as a gun control proponent is well-documented. From his support of gun-free zones at schools to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, Biden is Gun Control Inc.’s guy. With Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, there will most certainly be attempts to ram gun control down our throats. If they can’t beat us legislatively, they will most certainly use the courts to undermine the Second Amendment. Pro-gun organizations should be ready to lawyer up and use whatever means possible to keep courts from destroying our rights.
White House2 days ago
Secret Service Members Confirm That Joe Biden’s Mental Faculties are Indeed in “Bad Shape,” Dan Bongino Says
Around The World3 days ago
Biden Authorizes Attack on Syria, Kamala FURIOUS It Wasn’t Her Call
White House4 days ago
SLEEPY? Biden Yet to Deliver First State of the Union Amid Confused Public Appearances
Free Speech2 days ago
Wikipedia’s Founder is Creating New Free Speech Competitor to Website, Citing Leftist Domination
Free Speech3 days ago
Trump Preparing Case Before “Facebook Supreme Court” to Restore Platform Access
States4 days ago
SICK: California Bill Proposes to Fine Retailers That Maintain Separate Clothing and Toys Sections for Boys and Girls
States3 days ago
Michigan Republicans Demand Inquiry Into Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s Murderous COVID-19 Nursing Home Policies
Congress1 day ago
Arizona’s Paul Gosar Proposes Amending Coronavirus Package to Replace Pork with $10,000 Stimulus Checks