Connect with us

Free Speech

CONSERVATIVE INC. GAG ORDER? Lauren Chen of BlazeTV Deletes Popular Tweet Defending Charlie Kirk’s Critics

She deleted her post defending free speech and criticism from a Conservative Inc. smear campaign.



Conservative Inc. is getting desperate to suppress dissent after a grassroots revolt has started at “Culture War” events hosted by Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk, where the pro-drag queen student leader has been bombarded with questions about his ideology.

After a TPUSA event at Ohio State University crashed and burned on Wednesday night, Conservative Inc. is in full-blown damage control, and they are attempting to cancel paleoconservative video blogger Nick Fuentes as a result.

Trust fund conservative Will Chamberlain, who has presided over the fizzling Human Events re-launch, accused Fuentes of “anti-semitism” in many Twitter posts throughout the day.

BlazeTV’s Lauren Chen cried foul at Chamberlain’s desperate smears and made a post in favor of free speech for TPUSA’s critics.

Her Twitter post, which quickly racked up many likes on the platform, can be seen here:

However, Chen removed the post from Twitter after it started to gain popularity, perhaps after receiving orders from her boss Glenn Beck.

Kirk makes frequent appearances on Beck’s radio show where he receives effusive praise from the former “Never Trump” leader.

The orders have clearly come from the top, as the right-wing griftosphere lines up to throw Fuentes under the bus. They are using leftist guilt-by-association tactics to smear Kirk’s questioners in an attempt to quell the grassroots uprising against Conservative Inc.

Disgraced plagiarist turned TPUSA speaker Benny Johnson compared the questioners to the Westboro Baptist Church for having the audacity to oppose the LGBT agenda:

Former Trump administration official Sebastian Gorka petitioned Twitter to have Fuentes thrown off the platform, calling him a “holocaust denier” without offering proof:

Co-founder of Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire blog, Jeremy Boreing bashed the questioners for not understanding the virtues of American liberalism:

Frequent Trump critic Brad Polumbo of the Washington Examiner gave credit to Kirk for defending the LGBT agenda by hurling insults toward Christian questioners:

Another Washington Examiner reporter, Siraj Hashmi posted a clip from a Young Turks hit piece in which Fuentes called for consequences to be levied against the fake news that President Trump has repeatedly called the enemies of America:

However, not every voice is piling on to destroy Fuentes and malign the free speech of Kirk’s questioners. Some prominent right-wingers have defended the questioners, and criticized the leftist-style digital lynch mob orchestrated by Conservative Inc.

Independent journalist Mike Cernovich expressed shock at Conservative Inc. figures calling for Fuentes to get booted from social media:

Popular video blogger Paul Joseph Watson of Summit News posted a video response to the controversy in which he explained the gate-keeping ways of Turning Point’s UK chapter:

Michelle Malkin echoed the concerns of one questioner who called out Kirk for his immigration policies that would open the flood gates for foreign workers from the third-world to come to the US and vote Democrat:

The grassroots revolt against Kirk is making it easier than ever to see who is genuine in the American right, as Conservative Inc. readily adopts the tactics of the Left to stifle the dissent it cannot control.

Free Speech

Supreme Court Rules That Foreign Soros-Backed Operatives Do Not Have First Amendment Rights

The ruling was against the Soros-backed Alliance for Open Society International.



The Supreme Court issued a ruling on Monday making it clear that a major front of progressive billionaire oligarch George Soros does not have 1st Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution.

In the case of Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, and John Roberts ruled against 1st Amendment right for the Soros front. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented against the majority while Justice Elena Kagan did not take part in the case.

The Alliance for Open Society International hoped to soak up federal funds earmarked to stop HIV/AIDS throughout the world. However, they hit a snag due to an act of Congress banning any group that supports prostitution from taking these funds. The pro-hooker leftist group attempted to sue to get around that act of Congress, but were rebuked by the conservative majority. Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion for the case.

“We appreciate that plaintiffs would prefer to affiliate with foreign organizations that do not oppose prostitution,” Kavanaugh wrote. “But Congress required foreign organizations to oppose prostitution in return for American funding. And plaintiffs cannot export their own First Amendment rights to shield foreign organizations from Congress’s funding conditions.”

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Those foreign organizations are legally separate from the American organizations. And because foreign organizations operating abroad do not possess constitutional rights, those foreign organizations do not have a First Amendment right to disregard the Policy Requirement,” he continued.

“In sum, plaintiffs’ foreign affiliates are foreign organizations, and foreign organizations operating abroad possess no rights under the U. S. Constitution,” Kavanaugh concluded.

Justice Thomas wrote a concurrence to Kavanaugh’s opinion in favor of the ruling as well. He went even further than Kavanaugh in supporting Congress’ prohibition on issuing HIV relief funds to organizations that support prostitution.

“The Policy Requirement does not violate the First Amendment, regardless of whether it is applied to respondents, respondents’ legally distinct foreign affiliates, or any other organization, foreign or domestic,” Thomas wrote.

The Soros network is unhappy about the ruling and the fact that they will be denied the federal funds because of their international support for the flesh trade.

“The Supreme Court upheld the U.S. government’s quest to impose its harmful ideological agenda on U.S. organizations and restrict their right to free speech,” said Patrick Gaspard, president of the Open Society Foundations.

“The Anti-Prostitution Pledge compromises the fight against HIV by impeding and stigmatizing efforts to deliver health services. Condemnation of marginalized groups is not a public health strategy,” Gaspard added.

Regardless of their whining, the decision is final. The ruling could have the cascading effect of denying foreign Soros-backed operations any constitutional protections in terms of their alleged support for terror groups such as Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA as well.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!