Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Deep State

Federal Judge Dismisses Suit Alleging Collusion Between Trump, Stone, Wikileaks and Russians

Published

on

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that claimed President Donald J. Trump and associate Roger Stone colluded with Wikileaks and the Russian government in order to publish hacked Democratic National Committee emails during the 2016 election campaign.

“U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle said in a ruling Tuesday evening that the suit’s efforts to tie the Trump campaign and Stone’s alleged actions to the nation’s capital were too flimsy for the case to proceed in a Washington, D.C., court,” says a Politico report.

Huvelle, appointed by President William J. Clinton, noted that Trump and Stone’s activities “did not involve acts taken in furtherance of the conspiracies to disseminate emails that harmed plaintiffs.”

The suit was filed last year by two DNC donors, Roy Cockrum and Eric Schoenberg and a former DNC staffer. They alleged that Trump and Stone had acted illegally with Wikileaks to publish damning emails obtained from DNC servers.

Trending: DOCUMENT: Peter Strzok Was CIA And FBI At The Same Time, Say Experts

With the bogus “Russian collusion” narrative off the table, the question remains: how did Wikileaks obtain the emails?

Many, including pulitzer-prize winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, have theorized that the source of the emails was disgruntled DNC staffer Seth Rich. Founder of Wikileaks Julian Assange has hinted that Rich was the source, but is obligated to remain silent. Rich was reportedly upset that the DNC had rigged the primary election in favor of failed presidential candidate Hillary R. Clinton.

Big League Politics reported:

“Former Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks, according to a federal investigator who saw information on the case in the hours after Rich’s murder. Rich was killed four days after the Justice Department closed its Hillary Clinton email investigation and twelve days before Wikileaks released the contents of the DNC’s emails showing that the party colluded with the Clinton campaign to deny Bernie Sanders the nomination.”

BLP Passage Ends. 

In any case, yesterday’s federal court ruling against “Russian collusion” conspiracy theorists is a step in the right direction in the clearing the good name of the President and his associates who have been wrongly slandered for nearly two years.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Deep State

CIA Whistleblower: Hillary Clinton Laundered Russian Money Through Uranium One

Published

on

Former CIA agent Kevin Shipp made bombshell revelations in an interview with Greg Hunter about the Hillary Clinton case. Is Hillary Clinton about to be indicted in connection with the Uranium One deal?

Shipp calls the Operation Crossfire Hurricane plot “a subversive effort to undermine the Constitution,” and that funding came from overseas. According to Shipp:

Russian intelligence easily duped Hillary Clinton into entering into the Uranium One deal. Hillary Clinton then used Uranium One to launder money worldwide as Russians pumped money into her deal. In fact, Russian intelligence “targeted” Hillary Clinton knowing she would be susceptible to corruption.

Watch The Interview Here:

As Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu presses world leaders to act on Iran’s growing secret nuclear program, a very obvious aspect of the case is being ignored by the mainstream media.

Hillary Clinton famously sold about 20 percent of U.S. uranium to the Russians, during her tenure at the Obama State Department, in a move that set off massive alarms about pay-to-play with the Clinton Foundation. But the “Uranium One” deal might have just been Part One of the scheme.

The Obama administration — which shipped Iran boatloads of cash toward the end of Obama’s term — oversaw the transfer of Russian uranium to the Iranians.

At least ten nuclear bombs’ worth!

Luke Rohlfing reports:

An FBI informant with first hand experience in the Uranium One deal testified to congress that Moscow paid millions of dollars to a U.S. lobbying firm in order to influence then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by helping Bill Clinton’s charities during the Obama administration.

The informant, Douglas Campbell, gave a ten-page statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, House Intelligence Committee, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, as well as being interviewed for several hours by committee staff.

According to Fox News, in the statement, Campbell stated that Russian executives told him that they were hiring APCO Worldwide in order to influence Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration.

In the statement, Campbell said that “the contract called for four payments of $750,000 over twelve months,” and that “APCO was expected to give assistance free of charge to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of their effort to create a favorable environment to ensure the Obama administration made affirmative decisions on everything from Uranium One to the US-Russia Civilian Nuclear Cooperation agreement.”

Subsequently, APCO did end up taking up client work on behalf of the Clinton Global Initiative from 2008-2016. APCO claims that those projects were “totally separate and unconnected in any way” to Uranium One.

Uranium One is a Canadian mining company whose sale to a Russian firm was approved in 2010. The sale, which had to be approved by the U.S. government, gave Russians control of a part of the U.S. uranium supply. The negotiation tactics from the Russians began to come under fire after FBI gained evidence that Russian operatives used bribes, kickbacks, and other dirty tactics to expand Russia’s atomic energy footprint in the U.S.
The testimony of Douglas Campbell has provided some of the most damning evidence proving corruption in the negotiations.

 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend