News
Mother of Deceased Capitol Officer Brian Sicknick Suspects He Had a Stroke
The family is still waiting for answers in this tragedy.
The mother of deceased Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick suspects that her son had a stroke after the fateful January 6th protest and riot.
74-year old Gladys Sicknick told the Daily Mail that the family still doesn’t know exactly what happened, but that Officer Sicknick was not struck on the head with a fire extinguish, contrary to false reports.
“He wasn’t hit on the head, no. We think he had a stroke, but we don’t know anything for sure.
We’d love to know what happened.“
The New York Times had falsely reported that Sicknick died after being struck on the head with a fire extinguisher, later going on to quietly retract reporting that had described the 42-year old police officer’s death as a homicide.
Trending: BETRAYED: How Parler Sold Out to the Globalist Establishment to Get Back Online
House Democrats had also falsely repeated information claiming Sicknick died after a physical assault in articles of impeachment, declining to correct their dramatically false accusation after President Trump was acquitted.
Investigators looking into the January 6th event are reportedly questioning if Sicknick suffered from an adverse medical reaction in response to chemical agents used at the riot such as bear spray. However, it’s all speculation, with little to no authoritative information released to the public on the nature of the death. Sicknick had texted his brother confirming that he was alright after the event, going on to collapse at a Capitol Police facility. He would be placed on a ventilator at a hospital and would die the next day.
Officer Sicknick’s death represents a profound tragedy regardless of its circumstances. The National Guard veteran was known as a Donald Trump supporter, and the nature of his untimely death needs to be investigated objectively, not politically.
“It hasn’t helped, no,” said Sicknick’s mother of the flurry of speculation regarding his death. “It’s very hard not knowing [what happened] but we have to wait for a finding just like everybody else.”
Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.
Big League Guns
Merrick Garland Suggests that Getting Rid of Lawsuit Protections is Not a Second Amendment Violation
Garland as AG will be a disaster for the right to bear arms.
If Merrick Garland is nominated as Attorney General, the Second Amendment is in big trouble.
Based on his comments at a Senate hearing on February 22, 2021, Garland made a suggestion that the repeal of lawsuit protections for gun manufacturers is not unconstitutional.
AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News reminded his readers that President Joe Biden campaigned on a platform of repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shielded lawful gun manufacturers from lawsuits.
In a previous Breitbart News report, Biden spoke at an MSNBC forum in 2019 alongside gun control organizations such as March for Our Lives where he expressed his support for gun manufacturers to be subject to lawsuits.
At the speech, Biden suggested that the PLCC be repealed. He declared, “No other outfit in history has gotten this kind of protection” and asserted that the legal actions would bring about “change overnight.”
In a subsequent occasion on February 7, 2020, Breitbart News covered Biden’s remarks to a New Hampshire crowd, in which he stated that it was a “mistake” to shield firearms manufacturers from lawsuits. He continued, “The first thing I’m going to do as president is work to get rid of that.”
Later that month, Breitbart News recalled how Biden called out gun manufacturers at a South Carolina rally and boasted, “I’m going to take you down.”
According to a report by The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked Garland about his views on removing protections for gun manufacturers. Garland responded, “I have not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t think it raises a Second Amendment issue.”
When he was questioned if he is in favor of Biden’s plans to ban so-called “assault weapons”, Garland responded, “Where there is room under the law for the president’s policies to be pursued, then I think the president is entitled to pursue them.”
Biden’s track record as a gun control proponent is well-documented. From his support of gun-free zones at schools to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, Biden is Gun Control Inc.’s guy. With Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, there will most certainly be attempts to ram gun control down our throats. If they can’t beat us legislatively, they will most certainly use the courts to undermine the Second Amendment. Pro-gun organizations should be ready to lawyer up and use whatever means possible to keep courts from destroying our rights.
-
Congress2 days agoAn America First Patriot is Challenging Dan Crenshaw in Next Year’s GOP Primary. Here’s Why.
-
Two Americas3 days agoBlack Teen Travels to White Suburb to Commit Mass Shooting, Mainstream Media Remains Silent
-
Crime4 days agoBIZARRE: Biden Recounts Being Arrested After Trespassing in Senate Chamber in Old Video
-
White House1 day agoNOT MENTALLY FIT: Three Dozen House Democrats Demand Biden Relinquish Control of Nuclear Codes
-
Opinion3 days agoOpinion: CPAC’s Incompetency and Hypocrisy on Full Display in Their Handling of the Young Pharaoh Situation
-
Big League Economics4 days agoGas Prices Have Exploded Since Biden Entered Office
-
Big League Economics2 days agoGlobalists are Planning ‘Climate Lockdowns’ to Finish Off Economic Prosperity in the West
-
Congress3 days agoRINO ALERT? David Perdue Sat on Millions in Campaign Cash as Democrats Took Georgia Senate Seats
