In a huge break in Judge Roy Moore’s defamation suit against Leigh Corfman, the woman who accused him of sexual misconduct during his 2017 U.S. Senate bid, Moore’s legal team has filed a motion compelling Corfman to give a sworn deposition of the events in question.
So far, Corfman has refused to appear for depositions in which she would be asked, under oath, specific questions about Moore’s alleged misconduct. She has claimed to The Washington Post, but never in a sworn affidavit, that the Judge made unwanted sexual advances towards her when she was a teenager. The central question in the case is where the alleged event took place – whether in a trailer, or in a home.
“Her refusal to comply with discover has prejudiced Judge Moore and it is apparent that absent court investigation, Leigh Corfman will continue to violate the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, conceal evidence and deny Judge Moore the documents and responses he is due under the law,” the court documents said.
Another document describes the conundrum that Corfman has before her, whether the event took place inside a trailer or a physical home. She has not been able to confirm this detail.
Attorneys for each side are fighting over which side must be deposed first, and on which issues. Obviously, the Moore team does not want to answer deposition questions that would help Corfman “fill in the blanks” in her story – like what type of residence she was in when the Judge allegedly violated her. Even still, the Judge has been deposed, despite Corfman not answering his discovery.
The last document claims that Corfman would not “sit for her deposition because Judge Moor would not testify to ‘the appearance of his vehicle, his residence and his driveway in 1979, – the exact same question that Corfman refused to answer.”
From these documents, it appears that Corfman is trying to hold out, hoping that the Judge will be forced to answer further questions about the details of the residence before she is deposed. That raises suspicion. Why not just tell the court what she remembers? The answer, of course, is that she is afraid that her story will not match verifiable facts provided by the Judge, and that she will be exposed.
Johnny Davis, a former Alabama criminal defense attorney who currently runs an international and Constitutional law consulting firm told Big League Politics in a prior interview that Corfman’s story “cannot withstand cross examination” due to numerous flaws and irregularities. We reported:
“What we have to believe [in order] to believe Corfman’s story is that essentially Roy Moore grew up behaving himself, went to West Point and showed exemplary character there, served in Vietnam, went to law school, started practicing, in his early 30’s was a sexual predator for a while, and then was never a sexual predator again,” Davis told Big League Politics in an earlier phone interview.
“That’s not how it works,” he continued. “You don’t have an isolated year, 40 years ago of sexually predatory behavior. The pathology does not work that way.”
Davis also noted Corfman’s claim that the pair had a relationship of a sexual nature, but never had intercourse. The statute of limitations has run on any potential crimes with which Corfman could press charges against Moore. If she had claimed that the pair had had intercourse, he said, the statute of limitations would not have run. She would still be able to press charges against him to this day, and would have to face questions as to why she has not done so.
Davis told BLP Tuesday evening that he expects a hearing on Moore’s lawyers’ motion either later this month or in February.
Follow Peter D’Abrosca on Twitter: @pdabrosca
Like Peter D’Abrosca on Facebook: facebook.com/peterdabrosca
Daughter of Man Involved in Fatal 1972 Biden Car Crash Accuses Joe Biden of Falsely Accusing Dad of Driving Drunk
She says he wasn’t a drunk driver. And he was never charged.
The daughter of a man who was involved in a 1972 car crash that resulted in the deaths of Joe Biden’s then-wife, Neilia, and the couple’s one-year old daughter, Naomi, is accusing Joe Biden of falsely blaming her father for the tragic incident.
Deborah Criddle, the daughter of Curtis Dunn, is calling on Joe Biden to “set the record straight” on several claims he’s made in previous years, in which Biden suggested Curtis Dunn was intoxicated or an alcoholic when speaking about the crash. Dunn was never charged or convicted of any traffic or DUI violations stemming from the incident.
Criddle brought up Biden’s accusations towards Dunn in remarks provided to The Sun newspaper on Wednesday.
Criddle says that she became motivated to speak out on Biden’s claims after he repeatedly called Donald Trump a liar during the first presidential debate. She calls such a description as the “pot calling the kettle black,” and that “Biden has got a lot of nerve calling Trump a liar.”
Criddle has spoken out before, in 2008, when Biden made the latest of several inferences suggesting Curtis Dunn was drunk during the crash.
“A tractor-trailer, a guy who allegedly – and I never pursued it – drank his lunch instead of eating his lunch, broadsided my family and killed my wife instantly and killed my daughter instantly and hospitalized my two sons,” Biden had claimed in 2007. He previously suggested that alcohol was involved in the crash in 2001.
A Delaware Superior Court Judge, Jerome O. Herlihy- who investigated the crash at the time as a prosecutor- clarified that there was no reason to believe that any intoxication was involved in the incident when asked about the situation in 2008.
“The rumor about alcohol being involved by either party, especially the truck driver (Dunn), is incorrect,” said the judge in response to Joe Biden’s continued suggestions that Dunn was intoxicated at the time of the crash.
Police investigating the incident ultimately determined that the crash was determined by a t-bone accident in which the vehicle Neilia Biden was driving pulled into the right of way and was struck by a tractor Curtis Dunn was driving.
Criddle is describing Dunn, who died in 1999, as a loving father and family man.
The 1972 car crash was a tragedy for everyone involved, including then-Senator-elect Joe Biden, regardless of the exact circumstances. A one-year old baby and a mother of three children lost their lives. Falsely accusing a party involved of culpability- no matter how slight- without substantiation is a serious matter, one that Biden should answer to regardless of the passage of time since the incident.
Crime3 days ago
North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes
Violent Left3 days ago
Conservative Activist Brutally Beaten by Leftist, BLM Militants At Supreme Court
Violent Left2 days ago
Left-Wing Terrorists Leave Ominous Notes on Homes Promising Destruction if President Trump Wins Re-Election
Crime4 days ago
Authorities Identify Suspect in Maryland 7-11 Shooting of Mother of 4
States3 days ago
HUGE: Phoenix, AZ Trump Parade Stretches 30 Miles, 1500 Vehicles
Tech2 days ago
Google Engineer Admits to Company’s Political Censorship, Election Interference in New Project Veritas Sting #ExposeGoogle
Campaign 20202 days ago
THE FIX IS IN: Presidential Debate Committee Scraps Foreign Policy Questions after Hunter Biden Scandal
Culture2 days ago
New York Times Confirms the ‘Great Replacement’ is No Conspiracy Theory in Anti-Trump Op/ed