Connect with us

Fake News Media

New York Times Editor Sarah Jeong Hates The New York Times

This ought to make for an awkward company Christmas party.

Published

on

Over the past couple of days, the newest member of the formerly-esteemed New York Times editorial board has been scorched online for Tweets expressing anti-white hatred and anti-police hatred.

Further review of her Twitter reveals that, hilariously, she also hates The New York Times. 

“After a bad day, some people come home and kick the furniture. I get on the internet and make fun of the New York Times,” she Tweeted in 2013.

Trending: DNI Ratcliffe: China Interfered in 2020 Election, CIA Suppressed Info

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As late as May, 2017, Jeong celebrated a libel lawsuit against the former “paper of record.”

“You know what IS good? That someone is FINALLY suing the New York Times for libel,” she Tweeted.

“NYT Opinion = Thought Catalog for Baby Boomers,” said a tweet from 2015.

Jeong also speculated that most of the Times employees hate the Times’ columnists.

“I feel really bad for the 95% of the New York Times that already seethes with resentment over their horrible columnists,” she said in April 2017.

She also named names, specifically bashing certain columnists whom she cannot stand.

“Guys, what drugs do you think Paul Krugman does,” she wrote in 2014. (This is a valid question).

“My prof ripped on Nick Kristof today. It ruled,” she said in 2013. Kristof is the winner of two Pulitzer Prizes and a frequent CNN commentator.

Jeong really hates three-time Pulitzer Prize winner Tom Friedman.

“A just god would not allow Tom Friedman to keep talking,” she wrote in 2013.

 

“I have wept and I have prayed, I have prayed and I have wept, and Tom Friedman is somehow allowed to keep talking,” she tweeted on the same day.

Jeong hates NPR host Hanna Rosin too.

“Hannah [sic] Rosin shatters ceiling by proving women writers can be as hackish as Tom Friedman, too,” she wrote in 2013.

Tn a statement of excuses made by the Times on behalf of Jeong when her anti-white Tweets appeared, the Times claimed that they vetted Jeong’s social media prior to her hiring.

“We had candid conversations with Sarah as part of our thorough vetting process, which included a review of her social media history,” the paper said.

That is obviously either a lie, or the Times’ “thorough vetting process” is not as bulletproof as they seem to think.

Either way, Jeong’s latest batch of newly-discovered Tweets ought to make the Times’ Christmas party pretty awkward this year.

Big League Wellness

As Trump Leaves Office, Media Cites Ineffectiveness of Lockdowns and Democratic Leaders Display Eagerness to Reopen

Right on cue.

Published

on

With President Donald Trump’s impending exit from the White House, many are starting to perceive pivots from Democratic leaders and the mainstream media on the ineffectiveness of lockdowns and the reopening of society.

For example, Newsweek ran an article Thursday titled “COVID Lockdowns May Have No Clear Benefit vs Other Voluntary Measures, International Study Shows.” The study, published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, found through a mathematical model that there was “no clear, significant beneficial effect of [more restrictive measures] on [COVID-19] case growth in any country.”

This is just one study, of course, so it may not reflect objective reality any more than one study which concludes that lockdowns saved “millions of lives.” But after getting bombarded with messages from the media that lockdowns were necessary—with the opposite message found only on explicitly conservative outlets like Big League Politics—it may seem too coincidental to see such a story while the changing of the presidential guard takes place.

Not only that, it also comes at a time when some Democratic leaders appear to be chomping at the bit to reopen restaurants, bars, and schools—after several months of harsh insistence that they all must stay closed in the name of “safety” and “public health.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

On Monday, for example, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York called for the reopening of the state’s economy “smartly and safely.”

“We simply cannot stay closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The cost is too high. We will have nothing left to open. We must reopen the economy, but we must do it smartly and safely,” Cuomo tweeted.

Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot put out a similar call on Thursday, saying that bars and restaurants need to reopen “as quickly as possible” because it will help those businesses survive and reduce the number of large private parties and gatherings.

And incoming president Joe Biden recently pitched a $175 billion plan to return children to school, $130 billion of which would be for public elementary, middle, and high schools, the other $35 billion for colleges and universities. Many teachers unions stubbornly refused to return to in-person classes for the longest time, but now that Biden has come out in support of in-person classes, don’t be surprised to see them suddenly change their tune.

The left is so predictable, isn’t it?

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending