Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Uncategorized

Parents Outraged as 14-Year-Olds Taught to Orgasm in ‘Family Life’ Class

Published

on

After lies, cover-ups, and denials, a Virginia high school has finally copped to holding a perverse sex education seminar in an over-the-top “family life” class.

“I am absolutely appalled at the video shown by SARA… And now, I have the Department of Education, the Albemarle County School Board and the Western Albemarle High School to thank for introducing my beautiful daughter to the world of sexual pleasure, said an enraged parent. “Now, I have a dilemma. How do I undo the vision, the thoughts and the curiosity provided her by those in positions of authority that are supposed to protect my daughter while in school?”

Warning: The following content is graphic. 

The students were taught about male and female oral pleasure through videos by Laci Green, a vile and wretched YouTube personality who is anything but a role model for students – unless you’re trying to brainwash them into a unfulfilling life of sexual promiscuity. The sessions were led by Sexual Assault Research Center, under the guise of protecting students from sexual assault.

Trending: Drug Cartel Beheads 13-Year Old Girl After Murdering Her Grandmother In Alabama

“Very important question: ‘what about the balls?’ You’ve probably figured out by now that that is a very sensitive body part and you don’t want to go slapping it around,” says one of the videos shown to a class of female students at Western Albermarle High School near Charlottesville, VA.

Well, what about the balls, Laci?

“Some people like their balls licked, or sucked or put a vibrator to them; there’s all kinds of things you can do,” she advised.

Another one of Green’s videos, this one about female pleasure, was shown to a different class of girls.

“When you think about it, how big a guy’s dick is, or how long he lasts in bed, or how many chicks he sleeps with are very much a way that we can use to raise guys up in status or to emasculate them,” she says in that video.

Green refers to herself as a “sexual educator,” but I hardly remember my sex-ed teacher discussing anything other than how the female reproductive system worked and how babies were made. I certainly do not remember slang terms for genitalia being thrown around. Of course, that was 12 or so years ago – before radical the left, which was still then hyper-obsessed with sexual deviance – evolved to this unprecedented level of obsession. As Big League Politics reported, schools in California are teaching kindergartners transgenderism.

“Know your partner’s anatomy. The clitoris is really important, it’s like the orgasm command center,” Green said. “If you go straight to the clitoris and start fingering right away, your partner’s not going to be as aroused; it’s not going to feel as good.”

Green responded to criticism on Twitter:

“Angry parents, please understand that teens need safe places to talk about sex. if the info is not discussed at school, they WILL get it elsewhere — from less reliable sources,” she said.

Green has made two critical and faulty assumptions in her response. First, that parents cannot be relied upon to teach their children about sex, and second, that she is a reliable source.

In case there was any doubt as to whether Green was a liberal (or an intellectual), here is her commentary on the outcome of 2016 presidential election:

“We are now under total Republican rule,” she tweeted. “Textbook fascism. Fuck you, white America. Fuck you, you racist, misogynist pieces of shit. G’night.”

Green ought not to be allowed within 500 feet of a school, never mind actively sought out to teach our children anything.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Snowflakes

Democrat Congressman BLOCKS U.S. Veterans After Saying Strzok Deserves Purple Heart

Published

on

After receiving massive blowback and criticism for proclaiming that disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok deserves a purple heart, Congressman Steve Cohen, a Democrat who represents Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District, has decided to block Veterans who are responding to his ignorant remarks on Twitter.

During Strzok’s Congressional testimony on Thursday, Rep. Cohen sparked outrage when he told disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok that he should be awarded a Purple Heart.

“If I could give you a Purple Heart, I would. You deserve one. This has been an attack on you, in a way to attack Mr. Mueller, in the investigation that is to get at Russia collusion involved in our election,” Rep. Cohen said.
Cohen’s belief that Strzok deserves a Purple Heart, one of the highest military decorations that is awarded in the name of the US president to members of the military who are wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States, quickly sparked outrage online by people who knew better than to make such a disrespectful and insulting comparison.

After receiving a lot of backlash the day following the testimony, Cohen said he now regrets what he said. “I regret using the term ‘Purple Heart.’ I used it metaphorically, not literally. I never thought literally it should be given to Agent Strzok.”

Instead of apologizing to Veterans who fought and risked their lives for our country, Rep. Cohen is using the block feature on Twitter so that Veterans and other critics can’t respond to Rep. Cohen.

Rep. Cohen has blocked so many veterans that a Twitter user created a Twitter page for all of the people, mostly veterans, who have been blacked by Cohen.

Hundreds of users took to Twitter on Saturday morning to explain why they are blocked by Rep. Cohen with the hashtag #HeBlockedMeToo.

 

“I wish my four surgeries to rebuild me were metaphoric. You owe us an apology, not a clarification of the words you used,” one U.S. Veteran tweeted.

One user tweeted, “I told him the story of how my uncle got his Purple Heart in Vietnam & died from Agent Orange. Told him he owed Veterans a very public apology. He blocked me.”

Despite these heartfelt messages from twitter users whose family members received the Purple Heart and veterans who were wounded in war, Rep. Cohen has continued to block people, blocking
Generals, Colonels, members of Congress and wounded Veterans.

US Army veteran Mark Footerman, who is also a fellow for Hill Vets, an organization that encourages veterans to create global impact tweeted, “Member of Congress, Rep. Cohen, has blocked me, an Army veteran, for criticizing his deeply disturbing statement that Peter Strzok deserves a Purple Heart because he has sat through a tough congressional hearing.”

A female combat veteran tweeted, “I was blocked but @RepCohen is a coward…this female Marine Veteran will call TN Rep Steve Cohen a coward all day @RepCohen is a coward #RepCohenIsACowardlyDemrat Democrats can’t handle the truth.”

James T, A US Air Force Veteran tweeted, “Funny, I just checked and I’m blocked too and I’ve never tweeted about him or to him. Maybe he blocks all veterans. What an ass.”

A wounded combat veteran tweeted, “This is what happens when a wounded vet stands up to a Congressman who wants to give a Purple Heart to lying, narcissistic cheater. Apparently, he [Rep.Cohen] hates Veterans.”

One user who said they only created Twitter so that they could reply to Cohen’s outrageous comments said they were immediately blocked by the Congressman. “I joined Twitter so that my voice would get through to @RepCohen. Looks like it did. He blocked me 1 hour and 30 min after I created my Twitter account.”

Cohen’s belief that Strzok deserves a Purple Heart, one of the highest military decorations that is awarded in the name of the US president to members of the military who are wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States, quickly sparked outrage online by people who knew better than to make such a disrespectful and insulting comparison.

Not only was Rep. Cohen’s statement a slap in the face to all service men and women who have fought and served for the United States, but his intentional blocking of Veterans suggests that he has no respect or consideration for US veterans. On top of being anti-Veteran, anti-American, and anti-free speech, Rep. Cohen’s actions may have him in direct violation of the law. In May, a federal district court judge ruled that President Trump can’t block people from following his Twitter account. According to the judge, elected officials who block tweets with differing opinions constitutes viewpoint discrimination, which violates the First Amendment.

Thus, if President Trump cannot block twitter users who have opposing views, neither can Rep. Cohen, who is also an elected US politician.

Rep. Cohen’s office did not reply with a request for comment as to why the Democrat Congressman is intentionally blocking US veterans and Conservatives on Twitter.

Here is a collection of tweets from other US veterans and twitter users who also took to social media to ask why they had been blocked by Rep.Cohen.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend