Connect with us

Deep State

Peter Strzok Didn’t Think Michael Flynn Was Lying To Him, Documents Reveal

This is a huge step towards vindication for General Flynn.

Published

on

Massive news dropped earlier this month showing that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is not recommending jail time for General Michael Flynn, who briefly served as National Security Advisor at the start of Donald Trump’s presidency.

Flynn was facing charges for allegedly lying to the FBI during an interview about Russia collusion during the 2016 election. Being a part of the transition team, he was seen as an asset, due to the expected communications with Russia that an incoming Presidential Administration would partake in.

The now-former agent who led that interview is Peter Strzok, who is most well known for the anti-Trump text messages he was sending to his extra-marital lover, and fellow agent Lisa Page.

Trending: President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators

With his anti-Trump bias, there seems to be a lot of political motivation he could have to claim that General Flynn was lying, and he ultimately did say that.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But newly uncovered documents reveal that wasn’t always the case.

In the documents relating to the FBI interview, it claims that Strzok “had the impression at the time that Flynn was not lying or did not think he was lying.”

It goes on to claim that Strzok saw Flynn as “bright, but not profoundly sophisticated.”

This document casts clear doubt on the charges Flynn is convicted of, and gives more fodder to those who believe he was the target of political persecution.

It will also likely help Flynn’s attorneys in a possible effort to have the charges dismissed completely.

If they are able to file a motion to do that, and have the Special Counsel’s office sign off, it will be complete vindication for General Flynn, who has made major sacrifices for his country, both on the battlefield and off.

Deep State

WOW: John Durham is Reportedly Dropping Russia-Gate Investigation to Appease Biden ‘Administration’

Durham’s probe ends as an empty flop.

Published

on

U.S. Attorney John Durham is reportedly giving up on the Russia-gate investigation, as he is too scared to delve into the truth now that Biden has been announced as president-elect by the globalists.

Thus far, Durham’s investigation has been a huge bust. His work has only resulted in the prosecution of one individual – former FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith – for making or using “any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.”

Outside of this nobody, there have been no prosecutions that have resulted from Durham’s Russia-gate investigation despite the laundry list of evidence showing wrongdoing.

Sean Davis of The Federalist has reported that the investigation is over. Durham is apparently quitting because of cowardice.

Big League Politics has reported on Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch blowing the whistle on Durham’s failure to do his job and investigate what was arguably the biggest crime in U.S. history prior to the vote steal:

Trump supporters are waiting with baited breath for U.S. Attorney John Durham to come out with his explosive findings in regards to his investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion probe against President Trump.

According to Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton, Trump supporters are getting taken for a ride. Fitton said during a recent appearance on Fox Business’ “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that Barr and Durham are making no progress on investigating what very well may be the worst criminal conspiracy in U.S. history.

“You know, my concern is it’s been, what, sixteen-plus months since Durham was appointed and only now is he questioning Mr. Brennan,” Fitton said.

Fitton said that he is inclined to believe disgraced former CIA Director John Brennan when he says that he is not a person of interest in Durham’s investigation.

“I don’t see grand juries operating. I don’t see a bunch of witnesses coming in. I don’t see lawyers complaining about their clients being brought in before Durham,” Fitton said.

He said that the Mueller investigation was run much more thoroughly than Durham’s so-called investigation, the goal of which appears to be protecting the deep state.

“You know when the government is being pressure on witnesses and subjects and that is not evident here,” Fitton said, adding that it is his opinion that Durham is “not doing the work” needed to bring deep state criminals to justice.

Fitton did not object to Dobbs’ characterization that he is calling the Durham a “sham.”

“I’ll have to tell you. I’m a little concerned that the FBI is no longer an investigative agency because if this is the way they operate, it’s going to take them decades to deal with anything of real complexity,” Dobbs said.

It seems that Durham, and his boss Attorney General Bill Barr, were just deep state hacks all along. So much for “Trust the Plan,” huh?

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending