Connect with us

Big League Wellness

READ The White House’s ‘New Rules’ For Press Conferences In The Age of Jim Acosta

Published

on

The White House has issued New Rules that all journalists must obey when partaking in the time-honored tradition of the daily White House press conference. These rules apply to pressers led by both President Donald Trump and Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, who received Secret Service detail as Maxine Waters called for liberals to invade Trump administration officials’ personal spaces in real life.

Jim Acosta is clearly the delinquent here, having been banned from the White House and re-instated for 14 days after winning a lawsuit. It appears now that Acosta is back permanently, according to real-time news reports. But Acosta has to follow the rules this time around. (READ: O’Reilly Criticizes Fox News Management For Supporting Acosta).

The White House rules state:

  1. “A journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then will yield the floor to other journalists;”
  2. “At the discretion of the President or other White House official taking questions, a follow-up question or questions may be permitted; and where a follow up has been allowed and asked, the questioner will yield the floor;”
  3. “‘Yielding the floor’ includes, when applicable, physically surrendering the microphone to White House staff for use by the next questioner;”
  4. “Failure to abide by any of these rules (1)-(3) may result in suspension or revocation of the journalist’s hard pass.”
take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I delved into the psychology of the Jim Acosta scandal in my recent episode of Howley Reports:

Around The World

President Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor: Wuhan Lab is “Most Likely” Source of Chinese Coronavirus

Coronavirus may have emerged from a lab after all.

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor is speculating that the Chinese coronavirus disease escaped from a laboratory environment before spreading into mass circulation.

Matthew Pottinger, Deputy NSA since 2019, suggested that senior Chinese government officials had even come to realize that the disease emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology before entering the Huanan Wet Seafood Market. Epidemiologists originally suggested the virus came into existence at the market, where exotic animals were brought and sold in close proximity in an unsanitary fashion.

There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus,” Pottinger told British Members of Parliament in a Zoom conference last week.

Personnel of the World Health Organization are currently preparing for a comprehensive investigation into the origins of the coronavirus disease. Critics of the globalist organization- which is largely thought to be beholden to China- will cover up Chinese state malfeasance and dishonesty into the origins of the virus. An investigation into the devastating virus’ origins could have implications on preventing future outbreaks from escaping laboratory and research enviroments.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Chinese government has proposed a series of implausible theories alleging that the coronavirus epidemic originated in another country before entering China.

Scientific consensus indicates that COVID-19 evolved from bat viruses, first adapting to pangolins(an anteater-like creature) and mutating in a manner that made it capable of infecting humans. Scientists have broadly agreed on the virus’ zoonotic origins, while declining to decisively rule out the possibility of genetic engineering or laboratory curation.

The coronavirus escaping from a laboratory doesn’t necessarily entail the virus being “man-made.” It’s possible that scientists and researchers could’ve been collecting and compiling viruses native to bats in southern China, and unsafely exposed the materials to other animals or viruses that enabled the organism to evolve for purposes of human infection.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending