Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has been the only governor throughout the country with the backbone to reject third-world refugees being resettled into his state, and he has refused to budge on the issue even after being attacked by powerful special interest groups.
“I am putting my citizens first. We have challenges in the state of Texas that must be addressed by these very same nonprofit organizations,” Abbott said during an appearance on “Fox and Friends” last week.
“We have a growing homeless population in the state of Texas, and I refuse to allow the state of Texas to go down the same pathway of what we’ve seen in California,” he added.
Abbott’s “Texas First” comments caused Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president of the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS), to admit that federal refugee resettlement funds cannot be diverted to help Americans. The money is specifically earmarked to destroy the demographics of the United States, and those dollars are essentially being stolen from needy Americans like veterans or the homeless.
“The federal funding that nonprofit resettlement agencies administer limits its use so it can only be spent through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program,” she said in an email response to the Texas Tribune.
“Just as funding for the many federal programs meant to alleviate homelessness cannot be reallocated to refugee programing, resettlement funding cannot simply be reallocated to other problem areas such as homelessness – or even services for asylum seekers,” she added.
Abbott spokesman John Wittman struck back at Vignarajah for her comments, claiming that she is making a “straw man argument” to obfuscate the issue at hand.
“Governor Abbott knows exactly how these programs work and he did not suggest the straw man argument as some non-profits are making. They are suggesting that they can walk and chew gum at the same time by taking taxpayer dollars to help refugees while also helping the homeless with different funds, The Governor’s point is not money; it is effort,” Wittman said in an email to the Tribune.
“However much these nonprofit organizations are helping with the homeless issue, the fact remains that the homeless remain significantly underserved. To solve homelessness, Texas needs every nonprofit organization’s focus to be on the homeless, not how much money they receive from the federal government,” he added.
Vignarajah also admitted that refugees can absorb state-level welfare after they are trafficked into the U.S. from foreign lands at taxpayer expense.
“Like any other tax-paying resident of a state, refugees may be eligible for additional state benefits such as nutritional or housing assistance, but this depends on the eligibility requirements of each state, of course,” she said.
The federal records show that LIRS has received over $54 million annually during every fiscal year going back to 2014. Refugee industry whistleblower Ann Corcoran explains that LIRS has kept their federal welfare scam lucrative during the Trump administration by apparently exploiting so-called Unaccompanied Alien Children grants.
“84% of the ‘children’ crossing the border without a parent are above the age of 13. Two thirds of the teens are males,” Corcoran explained.
Despite the fact that organizations like LIRS receives tens of millions of dollars annually to help traffic third-world migrants into America, bleeding heart liberals continue to defend the lurid program based on humanitarian reasons.
“We’re not talking about people coming across the border. We’re talking about people seeking refuge from persecution. They have already been received by the U.S. They’ve been vetted, they’ve been screened and accepted. It’s just a mater of where they get resettled in the U.S.,” said Troy Greisen, director of World Relief North Texas, who is critical of Gov. Abbott’s policy.
Abbott’s stance against the refugee trafficking industry ultimately hinges on a court case filed by the pro-migrant welfare whore organizations to stop President Trump’s executive order that makes participation in the program voluntary.
VOTE STEAL: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules to Count Mail-in Votes Submitted After Election Day
The upcoming electoral fraud takes shape.
The Pennsylvania supreme court has made an incomprehensible ruling on Thursday that will allow mail-in ballots to be submitted and processed days after the election as long as the mail is postdated on election day or prior. According to the Inquirer, mail-in ballots will be allowed as long as it cannot be proven they were mailed after election day due to the ruling.
This will obviously open the potentiality for fraud, with activists having days to fill in the gaps and ramp up the totals for their candidates. The court also made other rulings that may allow Democrats to cheat more easily.
The supreme court ruled to allow drop boxes for the hand delivery of mail-in ballots. They are also refusing to allow Trump supporters from serving as poll watchers in other counties than their own, which means there will be fewer whistleblowers rooting out fraud. Additionally, they denied a request for other people to deliver mail-in ballots on behalf of voters.
Big League Politics has reported on how monolithic corporations are already saying that they will do everything in their power to censor all chatter casting doubt what is determined by the fake news media:
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is preparing to censor chatter on his social media platform doubting the legitimacy of November’s elections.
“What we and the other media need to start doing is preparing the american people that there is nothing illegitimate about this election taking additional days or even weeks to make sure all the votes are counted,” Zuckerberg said during an appearance on “Axios on HBO.”
“In fact, that might be important to make sure that this is a legitimate and fair election,” he added.
Zuckerberg says that his social network will be deploying a constant barrage of propaganda to convince the public that the vote is legitimate.
“So if one of the candidates in any of the races claims victory before there’s a consensus result, then we’re going to add some informational context to that post directly,” Zuckerberg said.
“I think this is important because there is, unfortunately, I think, a heightened risk of civil unrest in the period between voting and a result being called or after that, and I just think that we need to be doing everything that we can do reduce the chances of violence and civil unrest in the wake of the election,” he added…
The role of Big Tech in this election steal conspiracy is going to be key. From Zuckerberg’s comments, it seems like he is embracing his role as technocratic henchman for the New World Order.
There have already been prominent cases of electoral abnormalities that have emerged in recent elections in New Jersey and California due to widespread mail-in voting. After failing to rig the presidential election in 2016, the globalist establishment is playing for keeps this time around.
News3 days ago
Southern Baptist Convention to Rename Itself In Nod to Black Lives Matter Movement
Hollywood3 days ago
Michelle Obama’s Influence Over Netflix Led to Release of Pro-Pedo Movie ‘Cuties’
ANTIFA4 days ago
Black Lives Matter Rioter Who Attempts to Storm and Climb Police Car in Sacramento Is Sent Flying
Hollywood4 days ago
FBI Raids Home of Star Netflix Actor, Biden Surrogate In Child Sex Investigation
Hollywood3 days ago
#CancelNetflix: Netflix Stock Tanking As Viewers Unsubscribe Over “Cuties”
Fake News Media2 days ago
SHAMEFUL: Fox News Censors Newt Gingrich for Correctly Stating George Soros’ Role in Fomenting BLM Terror
Crime2 days ago
Omaha Business Owner Who Killed BLM Rioter in Self-Defense is Hit with Multiple Felony Charges
Videos2 days ago
WATCH: Darren Beattie Explains the Globalist ‘Color Revolution’ to Oust President Trump on Tucker Carlson